Hi Michael,
I saw that my libusb patch with the comment has been merged.
As I indicated below, I have realised that the problem I was looking at for a
user was due to a different issue so that libusb patch with the addition of the
comment can be rejected and reverted.
Regards,
Adolf.
On 01/
- Shipping the customservices file replaced the existing file on all users
systems, which
resulted in any modificationjs they had made being wiped out.
- Having thought about it further what I shouldn have done is just added the
additional
custom service of "DNS over TLS" to the end of the
Hi Michael,
Earlier this year someone had a problem where nut wouldn't work because it was
not linked to the correct libusb library and libusb had been updated in 2024. I
thought that this had been a problem of a failure in a library link after an
update because nut had not been shipped.
With
Hello Adolf,
Could you tell us my about why this is necessary?
The library should have a stable ABI so whenever they are being compiled
independently from each other, they should still work.
Best,
-Michael
> On 30 Jun 2025, at 17:12, Adolf Belka wrote:
>
> - libusb is a run time requirement
