The Little Manual of API Design [1] recommends adding a virtual_hook() that
can be used later on if we need to extend the class without BIC. Lots of
classes does not have this hook.
Isn't this something we should fix before Qt5 is out?
Jan-Arve
[1]: Little Manual of API Design,
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 Christoph Feck wrote:
Instead of rushing half-baked APIs, the 5.0 release should be a solid
base from which new and well designed APIs can be launched. The less
APIs are included into 5.0, the lower the frustation will be when it
is later discovered that they are
On Apr 9, 2012, at 8:02 PM, ext BogDan wrote:
- platform menu APIs. Current APIs are not enough for Android platform (same
for Mac OSX?), I need a way to *manage* from platform plagin the menubar and
the context menus, meaning that Qt must show/hide the menu(bar) using the
platform plugin.
On 04/10/2012 11:08 PM, ext Uwe Rathmann wrote:
On 04/10/2012 09:43 PM, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
Den 21:10 10. april 2012 skrev Uwe Rathmann uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de
mailto:uwe.rathm...@tigertal.de følgende:
You want to take a screenshot of the widget from within the widget's
own
Hi Girish,
I know that almost all QPA API are internal, I'm using them from the
very begging :) !
The problem is sometime if you want to create a clean API you also
must to change other APIs which are public. Let me give you an example
for better understanding. The QMenu subclass
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:57 AM, ext BogDan wrote:
Hi Girish,
I know that almost all QPA API are internal, I'm using them from the
very begging :) !
The problem is sometime if you want to create a clean API you also
must to change other APIs which are public. Let me give you an
- Original Message -
From: morten.sor...@nokia.com morten.sor...@nokia.com
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt5 missing features
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:57 AM, ext BogDan wrote:
Hi Girish,
I know that
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 11:40:15 BogDan wrote:
There is no QMenu::show, and this is the problem !:)
QMenu::show() calls QWidget::show(), which simply calls
QWidget::setVisible(true). And this one is virtual, case closed ;)
--
Christoph Feck
http://kdepepo.wordpress.com/
KDE Quality Team
Hi,
Gerrit https://codereview.qt-project.org/ will go down at 09:00 CEST
tomorrow Thu 12th 2012, for deployment of fixes.
Fixes are:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-190
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-195
I was never a really big fan of adding lots of virtual_hook()'s to
classes. vtable entries do come at a cost and in many cases it's not
really required. I am certainly against blindly adding them to all our
classes.
Cheers,
Lars
On 4/11/12 8:19 AM, ext jan-arve.saet...@nokia.com
Hello,
i want to develop my programs out of Visual Studio 2010. Everything
works now, but I don't get any syntax highlighting of any Qt specific
keywords, especially for QML.
Is there any possibility to get something working for that?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Greetings
Daniel Kreuter
Hi everybody,
hope many of you had the chance to take some time off over easter. I
certainly did.
Now that the alpha is out, there's work we need to do to get things in
shape for a beta.
We are now done with new feature development and changes to our API. I
will merge the api_changes branch
On quarta-feira, 11 de abril de 2012 12.12.23, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
I was never a really big fan of adding lots of virtual_hook()'s to
classes. vtable entries do come at a cost and in many cases it's not
really required. I am certainly against blindly adding them to all our
classes.
In
Hi,
On Apr 11, 2012, at 15:09 , ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
For non-QObject classes which *already* have virtual tables, we should
consider it. Fortunately, those classes are minority in Qt, we have very few
of them.
grep'ing through the source code, we have several virtual_hooks in Qt:
On 04/02/2012 03:59 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 2 de abril de 2012 15.36.57, Stephen Kelly wrote:
My question applies mostly to QtDBus, since I don't expect most people
will
know anything about that module. I've (ab)used Stephen's goodwill to
review
simple things, but I
Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process,
like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody.
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki
REQUEST AN INVITATION [docs.google.com]
Direct link with a free ad ;) http://tinyurl.ms/50kb
Hi All,
Doing more organization thought and work, we'd like to get the
discussion going about how to best organize the the schedule for the
summit.
My personal experience from last year was such that it was a bit hard
to decide which sessions to attend, some I missed due to room locating
Dear developers,
I'm more or less a novice (hardly any experience with Qt programming).
I've been bitten by the following bug:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-4447
and have submitted a bug report to VMWare (I'm still within the time
period when I'm able to submit technical
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:49 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
We are now done with new feature development and changes to our API. I
will merge the api_changes branch that contains the remaining changes to
our api back to master by the end of this week, and close the branch after
that.
I
Hi,
We would like to setup our existing project QtMediaHub under the
qt-project. QtMediaHub is a media player pretty much like XBMC. It can
stream media to multiple devices, can be controlled using remote
control and completely skinnable (using QML).
The official home page is :
On 11 April 2012 13:49, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
We are now done with new feature development and changes to our API. I
will merge the api_changes branch that contains the remaining changes to
our api back to master by the end of this week, and close the branch after
that.
What about the
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote:
Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process,
like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody.
If you say so...
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki
There will be at
Hi,
QTBUG-24543 reports that the tst_QLocale::windowsDefaultLocale() test is
broken and is currently being skipped.
I've determined this is because the Qt4 mechanism for triggering a refresh of
the Qt system locale whenever the system locale is changed has been removed
from
marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com said:
On 04/11/2012 07:49 AM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.commailto:lars.kn...@nokia.com
wrote:
** insignificant tests **
We still have quite some tests (around 110 in total) marked as
insignificant. This means they will be ignored by the CI system. Any help
to
On quarta-feira, 11 de abril de 2012 22.58.21, John Layt wrote:
Hi,
QTBUG-24543 reports that the tst_QLocale::windowsDefaultLocale() test is
broken and is currently being skipped.
I've determined this is because the Qt4 mechanism for triggering a refresh
of the Qt system locale whenever the
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:25:41 ext BogDan wrote:
- platform theme APIs, current APIs are good but not enough, BTW
KeyboardSchemes enum doesn't seems to used and IMHO doesn't contain
very cross platform values :). For several months I struggle to create a
style plugin for Android, I manage to
On 04/12/2012 11:00 AM, ext Alan Alpert wrote:
One thing I don't understand in this discussion is this theme manager concept
(like QStyle).
...
Why exactly do we need this level of indirection
Because of this:
import Widgets 1.0
As opposed to this:
//import MeeGoWidgets 1.0
//import
On 04/12/2012 01:20 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
If there was a standard API defined for a components and each
platform provided something that was source-compatible with this API
then that would work too (without indirection) but I haven't seen anyone
suggesting that a platform's components should
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 07:25:41 pm ext BogDan wrote:
the problem with QML desktop components is that
not all controls are touch friendly (e.g. lists, editbox, etc.), even they
have Android look the feel is not the right one. As I said, I believe is a
waste of time to have 3 completely
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:44:53 Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
On 04/12/2012 01:20 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
If there was a standard API defined for a components and each
platform provided something that was source-compatible with this API
then that would work too (without indirection) but I haven't seen
30 matches
Mail list logo
