Hi,
since we were discussing how to maintain QDoc and how to fix issues, I poked at
doxygen again.
I also sent a mail to it's maintainer who responded quickly and friendly.
I'm not sure if we want to go down this route, but it seems an option to me.
It means a lot of work, but so does maintaining
You should not need to specify TARGET. qmake chooses a default value.
But .pro files that explicitely set TARGET to be empty will produce empty
TARGET variables in Qt 5.
yes it was the issue, thank you very much for your help
___
Development
On Friday, September 21, 2012 18:16:48 Thiago Macieira wrote:
find_package(QtCore VERSION 5)
or
find_package(QtCore VERSION 6)
This is the right way of doing it,
I agree up to here.
provided that the VERSION is mandatory.
But I don't agree with this.
Anyway, I think the
On 9/22/12 4:55 PM, Jiang Jiang wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Stephen Chu step...@ju-ju.com wrote:
And also this one for consideration:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27198
At least this issue is fixed by 75cd2dec71d81868e1c4d5df32eb602faeb165fc.
Looks like
On domingo, 23 de setembro de 2012 13.10.32, Stephen Kelly wrote:
In transition times, distros either have to be more exact (add 5.0) or
change the name entirely (Qt5Core - Qt6Core).
We do not want them to rename. That would be bad for everyone involved. So
they need to replace the requirement
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 16:06:46 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 23 de setembro de 2012 13.10.32, Stephen Kelly wrote:
In transition times, distros either have to be more exact (add 5.0) or
change the name entirely (Qt5Core - Qt6Core).
We do not want them to rename. That would be
On domingo, 23 de setembro de 2012 18.00.26, Stephen Kelly wrote:
It seems like it would be nice for pkg-config files to be able to
contain
a
maximum version number for some start-number. Is that possible?
Sorry, what? I didn't understand.
I was thinking that the
Thiago Macieira schreef op vr 21-09-2012 om 16:47 [+0200]:
Include the major version number (5) in all library base names
Hi,
As the person who filed the mentioned QT-BUG in the first place I would
like to let you know that I'm +1 to the proposal from Thiago. For the
people who don't know me
On 9/23/12 9:18 AM, Stephen Chu wrote:
On 9/22/12 4:55 PM, Jiang Jiang wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Stephen Chu step...@ju-ju.com wrote:
And also this one for consideration:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27198
At least this issue is fixed by
