Re: [Development] Request for a new playground project

2012-11-01 Thread Sorvig Morten
On Oct 31, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jarkko Laitinen jlaiti...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have been developing a cloud integration module for Qt. The working name for the project is QCloud. It provides an API to do requests to Amazons S3 and Windows Azure. This has been my masters thesis project and

[Development] Moving Qt 4 mobility and qt-labs to gerrit

2012-11-01 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi everybody, this is mainly a heads up for all of you. As part of the transfer from Nokia to Digia, we've also inherited the rights to Qt mobility (4.x), as well as the content of qt-labs (http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/). We want to start moving these projects over to gerrit/codereview in

Re: [Development] Moving Qt 4 mobility and qt-labs to gerrit

2012-11-01 Thread Thomas McGuire
Hi, On Thursday 01 November 2012 09:02:44 Knoll Lars wrote: As part of the transfer from Nokia to Digia, we've also inherited the rights to Qt mobility (4.x), as well as the content of qt-labs (http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/). We want to start moving these projects over to gerrit/codereview

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, after reading through the whole thread, here's my comments on the different parts: On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:47 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: If I've forgotten anything, please add. As far as I can tell, here are the pending decisions, in increasing order of

Re: [Development] Moving Qt 4 mobility and qt-labs to gerrit

2012-11-01 Thread Lorn Potter
On 01/11/2012, at 6:02 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote: Hi everybody, this is mainly a heads up for all of you. As part of the transfer from Nokia to Digia, we've also inherited the rights to Qt mobility (4.x), as well as the content of qt-labs

Re: [Development] Versioning is not working for custom Qt5 addons

2012-11-01 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 01:03:33AM +0400, Denis Shienkov wrote: When creating a custom add-on for Qt5 not correctly applied version number for the target. For example, file /modules/qt_myaddon.pri have following content: these files are autogenerated. set the VERSION in the project file.

Re: [Development] Request for a new playground project

2012-11-01 Thread Jarkko Laitinen
The API at the moment supports the following operations: getting the list of buckets/containers from a certain users account, getting the contents of a certain bucket/container, getting a file from a bucket, putting a file to a certain bucket and creating/deleting buckets/files. At the moment

Re: [Development] Moving Qt 4 mobility and qt-labs to gerrit

2012-11-01 Thread Knoll Lars
On Nov 1, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/11/2012, at 6:02 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote: Hi everybody, this is mainly a heads up for all of you. As part of the transfer from Nokia to Digia, we've also inherited the rights to Qt mobility

[Development] Creating branches for our modules

2012-11-01 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, I guess most of you remember the discussion about branches some weeks ago (see http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-September/006691.html). So far we haven't created these branches, because the CI system wouldn't have been able to handle the load (because of it running

Re: [Development] Moving Qt 4 mobility and qt-labs to gerrit

2012-11-01 Thread Sergio Ahumada
Hi, On 11/01/2012 09:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote: Hi everybody, this is mainly a heads up for all of you. As part of the transfer from Nokia to Digia, we've also inherited the rights to Qt mobility (4.x), as well as the content of qt-labs (http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/). We want to start

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:02:20AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quarta-feira, 31 de outubro de 2012 12.23.27, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: 3) library versioning (i.e., adding 5 to the library name) -1 renaming is unnecessary: - there is no problem at all at run-time - the

[Development] qt-5 beta1 can't build with -no-opengl support

2012-11-01 Thread thouraya andolsi
Hi, Trying to build QT-5 without the opengl support, I got an output like: ../../include/QtQuick/../../../../qtdeclarative/src/quick/scenegraph/coreapi/qsggeometry.h:117:25: error: 'GLenum' has not been declared

[Development] Fwd: Versioning is not working for custom Qt5 addons

2012-11-01 Thread Denis Shienkov
Пересылаемое сообщение 01.11.2012, 15:06, Denis Shienkov scap...@yandex.ru: Hello Oswald, these files are autogenerated. set the VERSION in the project file. I.e. I should refuse and remove directory /modules (with all contents), and also to remove this mention from file

Re: [Development] qt-5 beta1 can't build with -no-opengl support

2012-11-01 Thread Samuel Rødal
On 11/01/2012 11:13 AM, thouraya andolsi wrote: Hi, Trying to build QT-5 without the opengl support, I got an output like: ../../include/QtQuick/../../../../qtdeclarative/src/quick/scenegraph/coreapi/qsggeometry.h:117:25: error: 'GLenum' has not been declared

Re: [Development] Moving Qt 4 mobility and qt-labs to gerrit

2012-11-01 Thread Sergio Ahumada
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Sze Howe Koh wrote: Is http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/qtgraphicaleffects an ancestor of http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtgraphicaleffects ? Regards, Sze-Howe Yes, it is. http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/qtgraphicaleffects/blobs/master/README.txt

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote: On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:47 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: 2) QML tool names Kai raised the point that many of the QML 2 tools work for QML 1 too and maybe even for Qt 4's QML 1. We need

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Jan Kundrát
On 10/31/12 15:14, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: there is no need to make it ignore anything, as -lQtCore would not find any of the above files. the unversioned symlink would be found by virtue of adding -L/usr/lib64/qt5/lib to the linker command line, and that directory (which you get from qmake

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 10.57.59, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: Ossi: let me ask you something then: do you want our make install to manage both /usr/lib *and* /usr/lib/qt5/lib? no. My argument is that the split is necessary because we're being asked to manage all of this.

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:20:02AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 10.57.59, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: as pointed out in another mail, this doesn't phaze us a bit - unless some distro thinks it's wise to override our choice and install an unversioned

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 13.03.56, Stephen Chu wrote: I find out what QPrivateSignal is for but it's not clear if lambda can still be used to connect to such private signals. If I connect QTimer::timeout() to a slot that takes no argument, it compiles fine. But when I try to

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 08.47.12, Knoll Lars wrote: 4) new installation paths (besides the bin directory) The latest patch I've provided creates a grouping of all arch-dependent files in ARCHDATADIR, with arch-independent files in DATADIR. That change, by itself, is

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 17.13.58, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: You MUST provide a set of installation instructions. This is YOUR proposal, which we must analyse and compare to mine. my proposal is very simple: wrap everything in QT_HOST_BINS (which equals QT_INSTALL_BINS on

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Stephen Chu
On 11/1/12 1:17 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 13.03.56, Stephen Chu wrote: I find out what QPrivateSignal is for but it's not clear if lambda can still be used to connect to such private signals. If I connect QTimer::timeout() to a slot that takes no

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:37:22AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 17.13.58, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: distributions should have *both*: /usr/lib/qt5//bin/assistant AND /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/assistant

Re: [Development] Heads up for Windows devs: ANGLE landing soon

2012-11-01 Thread Stephen Chu
On 10/23/12 4:26 AM, Jason Barron wrote: This is just a heads up for people developing Qt on Windows. We will shortly add a copy of the ANGLE project into the Qt 3rdparty tree and make it the default OpenGL configuration if no other option is given. If you're not familiar with ANGLE, you

Re: [Development] Pending decisions on co-installation

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 20.32.06, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: You're asking that they have a different 32-bit package to be installed on 64- bit systems than then 32-bit package to be installed on 32-bit systems. That's a policy change. last time i looked,

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 14.49.27, Stephen Chu wrote: Again. This is using clang 3.1 with QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -std=c++11 Is that the real clang 3.1, or the 3.1 version of Apple clang? They are not the same, they have different C++11 support status and known bugs. -- Thiago

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Stephen Chu
On 11/1/12 4:13 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 14.49.27, Stephen Chu wrote: Again. This is using clang 3.1 with QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -std=c++11 Is that the real clang 3.1, or the 3.1 version of Apple clang? They are not the same, they have different C++11

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 13.13.34, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 14.49.27, Stephen Chu wrote: Again. This is using clang 3.1 with QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -std=c++11 Is that the real clang 3.1, or the 3.1 version of Apple clang? They are not the same,

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Stephen Chu
On 11/1/12 4:28 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 13.13.34, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 1 de novembro de 2012 14.49.27, Stephen Chu wrote: Again. This is using clang 3.1 with QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -std=c++11 Is that the real clang 3.1, or the 3.1

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Olivier Goffart
Hi, It is the QPrivateSignal that is breaking it. It is only possible to connect to functor (lambda are functor) if they have the same number of arguments. The number need to match exactly, and it is not possible to omit any. (so you may not omit the QPrivateSignal argument) Using C++11 new

Re: [Development] Status of WP8 port

2012-11-01 Thread Baldo Davide
It would be nice to have 2 weeks update for each major internal project, qt blog is almost dead since it's passed to digia. Without any update digia is loosing credibility, but we all know that digia is worthy of trust and credibility, don't we? Regards, Davide Baldo On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:39

Re: [Development] Status of WP8 port

2012-11-01 Thread Sergio Ahumada
On 11/02/2012 12:31 AM, Baldo Davide wrote: It would be nice to have 2 weeks update for each major internal project, qt blog is almost dead since it's passed to digia. what do you mean by almost dead ? last blog post is two days old http://blog.qt.digia.com/ -- Sergio Ahumada

Re: [Development] Status of WP8 port

2012-11-01 Thread Turunen Tuukka
From: Baldo Davide baldos...@gmail.commailto:baldos...@gmail.com Reply-To: baldos...@gmail.commailto:baldos...@gmail.com baldos...@gmail.commailto:baldos...@gmail.com Date: perjantaina 2. marraskuuta 2012 1.31 To: development@qt-project.orgmailto:development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt5: Problem connecting QTimer::timeout() to lambda

2012-11-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 2 de novembro de 2012 00.23.43, Olivier Goffart wrote: Hi, It is the QPrivateSignal that is breaking it. It is only possible to connect to functor (lambda are functor) if they have the same number of arguments. The number need to match exactly, and it is not possible to

Re: [Development] Status of WP8 port

2012-11-01 Thread Charley Bay
Tuukka spaketh: What comes to WP8 we believe it is more important to tackle Android and iOS first, as discussed earlier. It does not mean we do not care about WP8. There is just so much more user base in Android and iOS that we think it would be outright stupid not to address those. +1 As a

[Development] how to change QGroupBox stylesheet image

2012-11-01 Thread tang ke
hello, when i develop with QGroupbox widget, I found that I can not change the checkbox image of QGroupbox. when I use the QCheckBox, I use the QCheckBox::indicator:unchecked { image:url(X.png);} QCheckBox::indicator:checked {image:url(XXX.png);} to change the checkbox