On 12/07/2012 05:33 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 17.12.06, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
>>> I agree in theory, provided that the tests that do stress out the
>>> integration are close to complete testing. In practice, there's no way to
>>> tell whether the testing is
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:13 PM, André Pönitz <
andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that
> > I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing
Le 7 déc. 2012 12:49, "Thiago Macieira" a
écrit :
>
> On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 11.57.06, Ziller Eike wrote:
> > > git://gitorious.org/qtwebkit/qt5-module.git
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > which is old, unused and deprecated.
> >
> > Guys, wasn't there some consensus to announce changes that
On 2012-12-09, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-12-09, Marc Mutz wrote:
>> 3. new features and bug-fixes that require new strings or BiC changes should
>>be submitted to 'dev' directly.
>
> binary incompatible changes should not be submitted anywhere except for
> Qt6.
I've asked to clarify the
On 2012-12-09, Marc Mutz wrote:
> 3. new features and bug-fixes that require new strings or BiC changes should
>be submitted to 'dev' directly.
binary incompatible changes should not be submitted anywhere except for
Qt6.
/Sune
___
Development mai
On Friday December 7 2012, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Friday 7. December 2012 13.52.43 you wrote:
> > On Friday December 7 2012, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> > > On Thursday 6. December 2012 19.08.41 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 06 December 2012 17:58:57 shane.kea...@accenture.com
wrote
On Saturday December 8 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
[...]
> We'll create the releases branch for the RC2 then.
Ok, trying to summarise, I understand it this way:
1. release-critical fixes are submitted and merged to 'stable' now,
'release' later, when it exists.
No-brainer fixes are also we
