Re: [Development] Read binary file

Op 19-12-2012 8:54, Yuriy Rusinov schreef: > Dear colleagues ! > > I have to read binary file via Qt. In console application I make > > I think you'd be better of asking this in inter...@qt-project.org. This list is about the development *of* Qt itself, not the development *with* Qt. André _

Re: [Development] Integrating QAction and the upcoming QML Action (was QAction-like API for QML)

Op 18-12-2012 20:34, Shawn Rutledge schreef: > On 18 December 2012 20:05, Mark wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> D) QCoreAction is added to Core or Gui and has even less >>> functionality, QQuickAction and QAction/QGuiAction build on top of >>

[Development] Read binary file

Dear colleagues ! I have to read binary file via Qt. In console application I make FILE * fid5 = fopen ("./test_data/source.rgg", "rb"); ... for (int i=1; i<=na; i++) { fread (st+i-1, sizeof (unsigned long), nd2, fid5); ... } and all work fine. In Qt applica

Re: [Development] If you're waiting for reviews from me...

Op 19-12-2012 0:18, Marc Mutz schreef: > ... please cut me some slack while I handle the attached non-maskable > interrupt :) > Oh dear, you're in for a long-term project indeed! Congrats! André ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org ht

Re: [Development] Integrating QAction and the upcoming QML Action (was QAction-like API for QML)

On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 23.19.50, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:20:39 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 09.46.13, Alan Alpert wrote: > > > B) QAction is moved to Gui and is used to create the QML API. > > > > You can't do that

Re: [Development] How I'm using qtchooser

On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 10.19.31, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 16.11.44, Hausmann Simon wrote: > > That's what I was afraid of. Perhaps your instructions should be extended > > to include fetching the latest changeset (something like git pull origin

[Development] Fwd: [Interest] [ANN] C++Now 2013 submission deadline extended to January 5th

Forwarding to dev and marketing. If you do some creative reading of the call for proposals and replace "Boost" with "Qt", we can have some interesting topics. I'd like to see more than just "how to use Qt and Boost together". -- Forwarded message -- Subject: [Interest] [ANN] C+

Re: [Development] branch namespacing policy?

On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 22.15.04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > moin, > > prompted by the discussion about the blackberry branch, i again started > to wonder about a cleaner separation of the branches. > > in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention > that temp

Re: [Development] If you're waiting for reviews from me...

What a beautifull project you got there in your hands  :)  Congratulations and all the best João de Deus De: Marc Mutz Para: development@qt-project.org Enviadas: Terça-feira, 18 de Dezembro de 2012 23:18 Assunto: [Development] If you're waiting for reviews fro

Re: [Development] If you're waiting for reviews from me...

Congratulations ! On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Marc Mutz wrote: > ... please cut me some slack while I handle the attached non-maskable > interrupt :) > > Thanks, > Marc > > -- > Marc Mutz | Senior Software Engineer > KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company > www.kdab.com || Ge

[Development] X Error: BadDrawable with Qt4.8.4

I compiled Qt4.8.4 in Redhat6(i386), but when I run my application, X Error: BadDrawable(invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) 9 ocurrerd chenyw3892___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Development] Integrating QAction and the upcoming QML Action (was QAction-like API for QML)

On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:20:39 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 09.46.13, Alan Alpert wrote: > > B) QAction is moved to Gui and is used to create the QML API. > > You can't do that. > > QAction is QtWidgets and that's where it will stay until Qt 6. We moved Q

[Development] branch namespacing policy?

moin, prompted by the discussion about the blackberry branch, i again started to wonder about a cleaner separation of the branches. in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention that temporary branches must all have a wip/ prefix. a similar convention could be adopted for v

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > i'll leave it at noting that this is somewhat weird, and that "the > project" may still decide that this doesn't belong into the upstream > repo. While it does sound a bit extreme, and I sort of pity the folks working on that branch, I

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:54:37PM +0100, Peter Hartmann wrote: > You are completely right about rebasing - that is exactly what we do > currently: We rebase our internal branch on top of the upstream 4.8 > branch regularly (at least once a week). Where I don't follow you is why > we would need

[Development] test for Mouse Buttons on OS-X

Hi. I would like someone with a Mac to perform the following test procedure. It attempts to verify mouse button numbering on the OS-X software stack, and proper interaction with the Window frame (Strut). (I don't have access to an Apple desktop machine). Hardware Prerequisite: a Mouse with middle b

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > On 18 December 2012 19:35, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: >> How is this going to work? If no iconSource or imageSource exists on >> the Action then the delegate in QtQuickControls uses >> "image://icons/.png"? > > Yes that's wha

Re: [Development] Integrating QAction and the upcoming QML Action (was QAction-like API for QML)

On 18 December 2012 20:05, Mark wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> D) QCoreAction is added to Core or Gui and has even less >> functionality, QQuickAction and QAction/QGuiAction build on top of >> that to fill out their API. > > Another option

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: > Something along those lines but also for Sampler objects where available > and higher level too e.g. A set of Texture Unit Configurations and also > that supports more features such as texture arrays (layered textures). > Ah, I have just real

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On 18 December 2012 19:35, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: > How is this going to work? If no iconSource or imageSource exists on > the Action then the delegate in QtQuickControls uses > "image://icons/.png"? Yes that's what I was thinking. Pros: - after you name the action, you don't r

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:06 PM, Peter Hartmann wrote: > some months ago, I was confident that this would be something temporary; > unfortunately, practice has shown that so far we always had a few > commits (1-10) that we needed to "short-circuit" into our branch because > some internal tea

Re: [Development] How I'm using qtchooser

On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 10.19.31, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 16.11.44, Hausmann Simon wrote: > > That's what I was afraid of. Perhaps your instructions should be extended > > to include fetching the latest changeset (something like git pull origin

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

On 18/12/2012 18:18, Alan Alpert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Sean Harmer wrote: >> 7) More enabler classes for textures, samplers, and higher-level >> abstractions. >> I think these would be good candidates for a Qt3D library, unless someone >> would really like to see a subset in Q

Re: [Development] Integrating QAction and the upcoming QML Action (was QAction-like API for QML)

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: > Summary of the topic so far: > > Existing and future Applications have a need for managing actions in > C++, and these need to be the same actions as QML is dealing with. How > do we implement this? > > Here are the four o

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On 12/18/2012 07:13 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Peter Hartmann wrote: >> Thanks for setting up the branch; however, would it be possible to get a >> 4.8-blackberry10 branch (without reference to the patch release number)? > >> We are not really releasin

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > On 18 December 2012 18:39, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Used like Jens suggested for components: >>> RowLayout { Repeater { model: myActions ; ToolButton { action: modelData} } >>> }} >>> >>> Granted, a bit too verbose. Howe

Re: [Development] Integrating QAction and the upcoming QML Action (was QAction-like API for QML)

On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 09.46.13, Alan Alpert wrote: > B) QAction is moved to Gui and is used to create the QML API. You can't do that. QAction is QtWidgets and that's where it will stay until Qt 6. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Op

Re: [Development] How I'm using qtchooser

On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 16.11.44, Hausmann Simon wrote: > That's what I was afraid of. Perhaps your instructions should be extended to > include fetching the latest changeset (something like git pull origin > refs/changes/20/43120/5 ). Otherwise the clone produces an empty checkout.

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Sean Harmer wrote: > 7) More enabler classes for textures, samplers, and higher-level abstractions. > I think these would be good candidates for a Qt3D library, unless someone > would really like to see a subset in QtGui. Do you mean something like QGLTexture2D, w

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On 18 December 2012 18:39, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: > Used like Jens suggested for components: >> RowLayout { Repeater { model: myActions ; ToolButton { action: modelData} } >> }} >> >> Granted, a bit too verbose. However with a little bit of convenience, we can >> for instance red

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

> > 7) More enabler classes for textures, samplers, and higher-level > abstractions. > I think these would be good candidates for a Qt3D library, unless someone > would really like to see a subset in QtGui. > What exactly do you mean by more texture enabler into Qt3D on the top of the existing tex

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Peter Hartmann wrote: > Thanks for setting up the branch; however, would it be possible to get a > 4.8-blackberry10 branch (without reference to the patch release number)? > We are not really releasing our own versions of 4.8.4, 4.8.5 etc., but > have o

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote: > >> On Monday 17 December 2012 14:55:51 Peter Hartmann wrote: >> >> > Alternatively I guess we could just clone the repo into a team clone. >> >> What is wrong with that option? >> > > D

[Development] Integrating QAction and the upcoming QML Action (was QAction-like API for QML)

Summary of the topic so far: Existing and future Applications have a need for managing actions in C++, and these need to be the same actions as QML is dealing with. How do we implement this? Here are the four options I recall being suggested so far, A) QQuickAction is added to create the QML API

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Monday 17 December 2012 14:55:51 Peter Hartmann wrote: > > > Alternatively I guess we could just clone the repo into a team clone. > > What is wrong with that option? > Different workflow, less visibility from the Qt contributors and s

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

With all the discussion about the C++ API and the C++ compatibility let me clarify that it is a different topic to the QML API. They're both important topics and I'd like to see both implemented perfectly, but they are separate topics with potentially separate implementations. The exposed QML API

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Monday 17 December 2012 14:55:51 Peter Hartmann wrote: > Alternatively I guess we could just clone the repo into a team clone. What is wrong with that option? Is it really important that everyone who wants to clone Qt 4 will also have your branch? Maybe separate clones are the way to go for

Re: [Development] How I'm using qtchooser

That's what I was afraid of. Perhaps your instructions should be extended to include fetching the latest changeset (something like git pull origin refs/changes/20/43120/5 ). Otherwise the clone produces an empty checkout. Simon From: development-bounces+

Re: [Development] How I'm using qtchooser

On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 08.59.16, Hausmann Simon wrote: > Did you forget to push / integrate qtchooser by chance? The repo is empty > for me No, I didn't. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,project:qt/qtchooser,n,z The changes haven't been approved yet. -- Thiago Macieira - thia

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On 18.12.2012 17.06, "Peter Hartmann" wrote: >On 12/18/2012 12:05 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: >> (...) >>> In case we decide to proceed with creation of a vendor branch, is it >>> planned to be a temporary solution or something permanent? > >some months ago, I was confident that this would be somethi

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On 12/18/2012 12:05 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: > (...) >> In case we decide to proceed with creation of a vendor branch, is it >> planned to be a temporary solution or something permanent? some months ago, I was confident that this would be something temporary; unfortunately, practice has shown that

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On 12/18/2012 12:26 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:00:25AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote: >> How do we proceed now? More comments? Some details for the expressed doubts? >> Some actions? >> > i created the branch 4.8.4-bb10 (which is also the version number you > should

[Development] Qt 5 RC Testing

Hello, There is new version available for testing: http://releases.qt-project.org/digia/5.0.0/backups/2012-12-18-389/ Best regards, /Rafal Rafal Motyka QE Engineer Digia, Qt Email: rafal.mot...@digia.com Mobile: +47 95005389 http://qt.digia.com Qt Blog:

[Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

Hi, I would like to start a discussion on the future level of support for OpenGL enablers in Qt for those that are interested. So here goes... I would like to add in a bunch more OpenGL enablers but am not sure on where to best put them. Some things I have in mind are: 1) Classes that contain

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Tuesday 18 December 2012 13:33:59 Robin Burchell wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> The details of the split > >> was just following Andre's suggestion. text/secondaryText might fit > >> into CoreAction, icon will not. > > > > Why not? Because QML doesn't do

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Tuesday 18 December 2012 13:24:59 Stephen Kelly wrote: > That's why it was a mistake to not extract a QGuiAction from QAction imo, > but it's a mistake we have to live with and deal with as best we can (for > both C++ and QML APIs). I would like to mention that one can still consider the possib

Re: [Development] Is "Generic Linux Device" QtCreator feature still working and maintained?

Hi, On 17 December 2012 23:13, Michael Hall wrote: > I am able to get Qtcreator to connect over ssh to my Nexus 7, but I > can't figure out how to get a project to run on anything by my local > machine. maybe it's a problem of my netbook? Which version of QtCreator and Ubuntu are you using to co

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> The details of the split >> was just following Andre's suggestion. text/secondaryText might fit >> into CoreAction, icon will not. > > Why not? Because QML doesn't do QIcons? The reason for that is not clear > either to me. I don't think t

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Sunday, December 16, 2012 21:12:18 Bache-Wiig Jens wrote: > > But if you are writing a 100% declarative UI you'd probably wish to > > avoid linking against widgets. So I guess you're saying regular old > > QActions should be exposed just for putting a declarative UI onto > > legacy apps, and al

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Monday, December 17, 2012 08:39:14 Alan Alpert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Bache-Wiig Jens > > wrote: > >>> What is so terrible about it? QtWidgetEnables would be private API, only > >>> used by components internally and we would not need to load the module > >>> on embedded, or

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Monday, December 17, 2012 01:11:55 Bache-Wiig Jens wrote: > >> How about having ToolBar.addAction() for convenience? It is exactly what > >> we do for widgets.> > > Widgets is a toolkit for an imperative language. Looping over lists > > and adding things individually is acceptable there. In a d

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 12:55:50 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Some of this came up before by the way, so it's another discussion to > review when designing this: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/957/focus=1883 Another funny thread from almost a full year ago: http://thread.

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Thursday, December 13, 2012 13:18:35 you wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > The reason for the split is not clear to me. Do you suggest that UIAction > > would be a QML element, not a creatable C++ class? Do you suggest that > > CoreAction would be a creatable C

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:00:25AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote: > How do we proceed now? More comments? Some details for the expressed doubts? > Some actions? > i created the branch 4.8.4-bb10 (which is also the version number you should announce your release as). members of the group "Blackber

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tuesday 18 December 2012 11:00:56 Turunen Tuukka wrote: > On 18.12.2012 12.25, "Sean Harmer" wrote: > >On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:00:25 Vladimir Minenko wrote: > >> > Sounds reasonable. > >> > Laszlo > >> > >> Folks, how can we conclude on this? > >> > >> There were two votes "Sounds reas

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On 18.12.2012 12.25, "Sean Harmer" wrote: >On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:00:25 Vladimir Minenko wrote: >> > Sounds reasonable. >> > Laszlo >> >> Folks, how can we conclude on this? >> >> There were two votes "Sounds reasonable", one comment with doubts from >> Tuukka and one more "natural" fr

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

> > Right, but referring to a file (bundled or in the resources) is still > referring to the icon by name, no? One of them is a logical icon-name the other one is a file-name. The logical name refers to an icon outside of the application, the file name refers to a file bundled inside the appli

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:00:25 Vladimir Minenko wrote: > > Sounds reasonable. > > Laszlo > > Folks, how can we conclude on this? > > There were two votes "Sounds reasonable", one comment with doubts from > Tuukka and one more "natural" from Sergio. > > How do we proceed now? More comments?

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Tuesday, 2012-12-18, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote: > > Now, you've most likely seen way more Qt apps than I have, but all I have > > seen were shipping icons, most of them as part of their resources, some > > as files. > > I am pretty sure this is a misunderstanding. We do not bundle the icons > insid

Re: [Development] requesting an own 4.8-blackberry10 branch on gitorious

> Sounds reasonable. > Laszlo Folks, how can we conclude on this? There were two votes "Sounds reasonable", one comment with doubts from Tuukka and one more "natural" from Sergio. How do we proceed now? More comments? Some details for the expressed doubts? Some actions? Thanks! -- Vladimir

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

> Now, you've most likely seen way more Qt apps than I have, but all I have > seen > were shipping icons, most of them as part of their resources, some as files. I am pretty sure this is a misunderstanding. We do not bundle the icons inside the Qt libraries. People bundle it with their applica

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

On Sunday, 2012-12-16, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote: > >> Sure. But we don't actually have support for logical icon names on > >> Windows, Mac or Embedded since we don't have pixmaps for those. > > > > I'm not sure what you mean. > > This is really sidetracking the discussion but Windows and Mac do not

Re: [Development] How I'm using qtchooser

Did you forget to push / integrate qtchooser by chance? The repo is empty for me :) Simon From: development-bounces+simon.hausmann=digia@qt-project.org [development-bounces+simon.hausmann=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Thiago Macieira [thiag

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.0 RC 2 released

ok, thanks. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTIFW-190 2012/12/18 Kalinowski Maurice > Hm, then it sounds like a bug in the Installer Framework. > > ** ** > > Please create a new report against > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTIFW > > ** ** > > Thx. > > Maurice*