Hi,
I think there will have to be further discussion around this. Ministro was
initially written to be a common-purpose library distribution, not exclusively
used for Qt libraries. It would be like depending on "apt" or something like
that. More discussion is needed to decide how to proceed wit
Note that with some tweaking, it is already quite possible to build statically
or bundle the libraries you want as part of your .apk if you're not worried
about the library size. We probably won't make a out-of-the-box-solution for
this for the Qt 5.1 release, since it just doesn't fit in the sc
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:22:31 +0400, Denis Shienkov wrote:
>>A cross platform compatible API for the serial port is a useful thing,
>>but is there a good reason for limiting it to Qt applications ?
>
> Why do you think that this is a limitation?
Well, an application using wxWidgets probably would
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt
>> Project by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose
>> Android app which is used for getting libraries and plugins on demand
>> when a Qt app is deployed to an Android device. This tool is call
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Abrahamsen-Blomfeldt Eskil <
eskil.abrahamsen-blomfe...@digia.com> wrote:
> About protecting against unexpected behavior: I think this will be an
> issue anyway, since you're depending on several shared libraries in the
> platform in addition to Qt, and they can
On 01/10/2013 05:46 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>I'd like to make C++ models more usable from QML; in the net there
> are several blog posts illustrating how to achieve that, but IMHO it
> would be better if at least some of these handy features were in
> QAbstractListModel itself:
>
> - "count
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> In general I see 2 reasons why a lib should be using Qt:
>
> 1) The implementation has a significant benefit from using Qt
> 2) The API needs to use Qt classes to be "usable in a comfortable way" in
> a Qt application
>
As far as I can brief
I have made Visual Studio 2010 Project of minimal QT 5.0. I needed it since
i was not able to generate Visual Studio Project files from configure
script. It is debug version and one can understand the flow of QT by using
the excellent debugging features provided in Visual studio.
Please mail me and
Hi Uwe,
First, QtSerialPort closely linked to the Qt event-loop subsystem with using
fully async signal/slots concept.
This allows you to not use a separate thread to monitor I/O events.
> By the way: what are the major differences between QtSerialPort and the
> qextserialport project ?
IMHO, t
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> 2) Implementation
>
> * We use Q_ENUMS, Q_DECLARE_FLAGS, Q_DECLARE_OPERATORS_FOR_FLAGS and so
> forth for the serial port related enumerations like baudrate, databits,
> parity, stop bits, flow control, and so forth.
>
> * We use windows spec
Hi Denis + Laszlo,
> IMHO, this for QextSerialPort: do not see any features.
QextSerialPort is pretty old ( from the 90s ) and the fact that it isn't
really a Qt library is probably the reason why it has survived all the
development of Qt without being actively maintained.
But I don't vote for
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> Hi Denis + Laszlo,
>
> > IMHO, this for QextSerialPort: do not see any features.
>
> QextSerialPort is pretty old ( from the 90s ) and the fact that it isn't
> really a Qt library is probably the reason why it has survived all the
> developmen
On Saturday, 12 January 2013 15:13:49 CEST, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> the serial port and a plot library are a very natural combination and the
> idea of a special plot widget that is tailored to display values from the
> serial port has been discussed several times.
Armchair serial port user here.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Qt 5.0.0 is out I feel that it is a good time to also emphasize
> show cases
> of Qt and QML as a technology. In Qt 4 we've had a couple of pretty nice
> demos
> in the source code, including a pretty neat demo browser.
On sábado, 12 de janeiro de 2013 12.22.59, Mumtaz Ahmad wrote:
> Is it known issue that QT5.0 does not create VC2010 Projects?
No. Can you report the issue, complete with steps to reproduce it, on the
bugtracker?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Ope
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how the "Generic Linux Device" plugin of
QtCreator works and I've some questions to ask, to understand if it
already does what I need or if I need to fork it and customize for my
needs.
For some weeks I could not work to this and now I will try to restart
from where I
Hello,
As many of you may already know, we (necessitas and qt-project) join the
forces to port some
of the Qt5 modules on Android in time for Qt 5.1 release. Sadly, Ministro, is
not yet prepared to
handle two versions of Qt at the same time, and it needs some love to do it.
This my to do lis
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As part of the Android-port of Qt 5 being contributed to the Qt
>>> Project by BogDan, he also contributed the code for a general-purpose
>>> Android app which is used for getting libraries and plugins on demand
>>> when a Qt app is deployed to an Android device. This tool
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
> That said, I am not sure I am entirely ok with this. I would like a single
> repository for quality tested Qt libraries and not an arbitrary collection
> of open source libraries of various quality that any application could pull
> in. I
Hi,
what about adding a new Quick item for "enhanced QAbstractItemModel access".
ListModelAdapter {
id: myModelAdapter
sourceModel: myModel
}
ListView {
model: myModelAdapter.sourceModel
delegate: Text {
MouseArea {
onClicked: console.log(myModelAdapter.data(model.index, "myRol
Random idea: can't we use Android's Services API to do a
"QtLibrariesFolderPathRequest", and only the first Android-Qt
application (with the 'Ministro-built-in', building on OP's idea) that
gets an empty/null string from the service request goes on to download
the libraries to it's local folder and
Sorry for double post, but I thought up a solution to the wasted
bandwidth con (by using the SD card as a download cache). Bleh.
Basically on null/empty folder path we then proceed to check some SD
card download cache to copy the libs to the local dir and set up the
service provider. If they aren'
22 matches
Mail list logo