Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-26 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 26.01.2013 07:34, Laszlo Papp wrote: Good question; we discussed this issue before. This is unfortunately also a real problem for us to test the module with all the combinations for each factor. It requires (semi-)manual testing and hence a bit of effort. I see two ways to improve the

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-26 Thread Konrad Rosenbaum
On Saturday 26 January 2013, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote: And a question: There's no auto tests. I know that testing serial ports can't really be done in an automated fashion, but is there anything we can do to cover the

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

2013-01-26 Thread Alex Strickland
On 2013/01/26 01:44 PM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: Windows: there are several projects on Sourceforge that emulate serial interfaces. I've used com0com to simulate loops. +1 for com0com. -- Regards Alex

Re: [Development] Removing QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER macros in Qt 5.1

2013-01-26 Thread Ahumada Sergio
On 01/15/2013 05:15 PM, André Pönitz wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:09:48PM +, Ahumada Sergio wrote: Hi, While I was trying to mark tst_headers as significant again https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-324 I found out that I had to add some QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER macros