Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 17:14:53 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:23:10 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> >> As a followup, qt-5.0.2 + the cmake patch mentioned elsewhere in this
>> >> thread, we're down to a single failure (which looks
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 17:14:53 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:23:10 Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> As a followup, qt-5.0.2 + the cmake patch mentioned elsewhere in this
> >> thread, we're down to a single failure (which looks a *lot* like the
> >
> >> p
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:23:10 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> As a followup, qt-5.0.2 + the cmake patch mentioned elsewhere in this
>> thread, we're down to a single failure (which looks a *lot* like the
>> problem of the other modules we fixed already):
>
> Great! That's prog
Hi,
I've been working and solving some Qt3D bugs on my own for the past few
months.
During that time I've found some important features to be missing. I'm
talking more specifically
about the Qml bindings of Qt3D, Quick3D rather than Qt3D itself.
First of all, being able to render a QQ
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 16:08:35 Ahumada Sergio wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 13:13:21 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> >> Here's the output of our build machine. Had to wing some of the commands.
> >
> > Is this configuration already 'enforcing'?
>
> You mean win64-msvc2012_developer-build_q
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 13:13:21 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
>> Here's the output of our build machine. Had to wing some of the commands.
>>
>
> Is this configuration already 'enforcing'?
You mean win64-msvc2012_developer-build_qtnamespace_Windows_8 for qtbase#stable
?
Yes, it's enforcing since J
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 13:13:21 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> Here's the output of our build machine. Had to wing some of the commands.
>
Is this configuration already 'enforcing'?
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,53410
failed when trying to integrate this patch. As the original repor
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:23:10 Rex Dieter wrote:
> As a followup, qt-5.0.2 + the cmake patch mentioned elsewhere in this
> thread, we're down to a single failure (which looks a *lot* like the problem
> of the other modules we fixed already):
Great! That's progress at least.
Are the updated
On 4/10/13 3:30 AM, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
>> Done the Gerrit part.
>> >
>> >John, you might want to update http://qt-project.org/wiki/Maintainers as
>> >well.
> I've now also updated Jira permissions. John, you're now the project owner
> for pyside, and should have all required
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Saturday, March 30, 2013 13:39:20 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> > On Saturday, March 30, 2013 10:25:58 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> >> > What is in your configure line?
>> >>
>> >> gory detail here,
>> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qt5-qtbase.git/tree/qt5-
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Note that it is not in Qt 5.0.2, so you may want to cherry-pick it into
> the package for that.
I did just that.
-- rex
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 08:16:15 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 22:03:14 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> However, there is also an upstream bug for me to fix here. The
> >> Config.cmake files contain incorrect arguments to find_package, so they
> >> are not a
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 13:13:21 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> Here's the output of our build machine. Had to wing some of the commands.
>
Thanks. From the discussion on the cmake list, this seems to be expected
because of a bug in the test script. Could you test
https://codereview.qt-project.
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 22:03:14 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> However, there is also an upstream bug for me to fix here. The
>> Config.cmake files contain incorrect arguments to find_package, so they
>> are not able to find their dependencies (eg, Qt5Gui cmake package can't
>>
Here's the output of our build machine. Had to wing some of the commands.
-Tony
-Original Message-
From: Saether Jan-Arve
Sent: 10. huhtikuuta 2013 16:01
To: Stephen Kelly; development@qt-project.org
Cc: Sarajärvi Tony; Andreas Holzammer; Patrick Spendrin
Subject: RE: [Development] CMake
Attached is the essential output, Stephen.
Interestingly, the tool chain I had in this shell was msvc2010 (x64).
(As you can see from the call to 'cl')
However, cmake doesn't seem to pick that up and instead picks up my older 2008
compiler.
Inspecting the qtcmaketest.vcproj file also shows the i
We are happy to announce that Qt 5.0.2 is released today.
Blog post: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/04/10/qt-5-0-2-released/
Download: http://qt-project.org/downloads/
--
Akseli Salovaara
Digia, Qt
___
Announce mailing list
annou...@qt-project.or
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 07:30:34 you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we encountered some trouble when setting up a new CI machine where we would
> run Windows 7 64 bit and compile in 64 bit mode. The CMake tests fail
> there.
Andy/Patrick, have you ever seen something like this before?
ClCompile:
18 matches
Mail list logo
