On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 19:10:50, Chris Gilbert wrote:
> Is there any chance that the patch currently in 5.1.2 for this bug can
> be put into 5.1.1?
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-31803
>
> QT is largely non-operable on OSX 10.9 currently. Having this in 5.1.1
> wo
Is there any chance that the patch currently in 5.1.2 for this bug can
be put into 5.1.1?
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-31803
QT is largely non-operable on OSX 10.9 currently. Having this in 5.1.1
would be a huge benefit to those of us trying to support 10.9 out of the
gate.
T
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Bubke Marco wrote:
> What about making ApplicationWindow a Item? We could skip the contentItem
> and there would be designer support.
ApplicationWindow can't be an Item because it encapsulates a Window
(see the discussion in
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/d
Hi,
I would also make it an addon for now.
There is one reason why it would need to go in QtNetwork, and that is to
allow upgrading a QNetworkRequest/QNetworkReply into a QWebSocket.
That would be a complex feature to implement, and isn't required to use
websockets.
I believe that a QML/javascrip
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan Alpert [mailto:4163654...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:31 AM
>> To: Koehne Kai
>> Cc: Blasche Alexander; Bubke Marco; development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: Re: New JIRA type 'Featur
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-33093 . Just saw this in
my app - can anyone confirm ?
Petko
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
I see, thanks.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 21:04:38, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> > Is the patch scheduled for post Qt 5.1.1 or there's been some
> > misunderstanding while merging it for Qt 5.1.1?
>
> It missed the 5.1.1 branching. I
Hello all!
I was reading this interesting thread, still fresh:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-August/012492.html
And I have to say is that I'm very interested in how developers can use
resources that already exists in the Qt framework, specially about
networking.
An
On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 21:04:38, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> Is the patch scheduled for post Qt 5.1.1 or there's been some
> misunderstanding while merging it for Qt 5.1.1?
It missed the 5.1.1 branching. It's on the tree that will become 5.1.2.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT)
Hi,
The snapshot of Qt5.1 from Aug 20 still doesn't seem to contain the fixes.
I downloaded the source code from (subfolder "single")
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.1/5.1.1-rc1/backups/2013-08-20-107/
And compared the contents of the source file
qt-src-5.1.1-rc1/qtbase/src/plugins/pl
Excuse my ignorance, but does this include adding notes for known bugs in
Jira? For example, there's a bug where all widget moves generate double
move events, and the second event has incorrect coordinates. It's
documented here:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32590
Would that be th
> That would be part of the discussed changes, but it's not there yet.
>
> For Qt 5.x, I suggest you configure Qt with '-no-icu', and then run 'qmake
> QT_CONFIG+=icu ' only in qtwebkit.
>
This worked with a slight variation:
configure with -no-icu
jom
On segunda-feira, 19 de agosto de 2013 15:14:03, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 2) -Werror is enabled only for certain compiler versions. I'll update the
> whitelist to have an upper range too. For example, right now it enables -
> Werror for GCC 4.6 and above. I'm going to introduce an upper limit beca
On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 17:17:47, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> On 8/20/13 16:46 , Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Actually, question to the Mac folks: XCode updates add deprecation marks
> > to
> > existing SDKs, right?
>
> I think so, yes. The 10.8 SDK that comes with Xcode 4.6.3 has some
> d
On 8/20/13 16:46 , Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Actually, question to the Mac folks: XCode updates add deprecation marks to
> existing SDKs, right?
I think so, yes. The 10.8 SDK that comes with Xcode 4.6.3 has some
deprecation markers for 10.9, and those are not present in the 10.8 SDK
I have on a L
On Tuesday 20 August 2013 12:38:13 Ahumada Sergio wrote:
> Done in Gerrit.
Thanks guys!
Regards.
--
Dr. Kevin Ottens | kevin.ott...@kdab.com | Software Craftsman
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-i
On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 11:01:47, Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > Right now, I've got most modules compiling with -Werror with GCC 4.7. I'd
> > like to start adding the CONFIG to enable the flag.
> >
> > Objections?
>
> One p
On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 07:23:28, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Here's another idea (no idea if we could make it work though): If the
> methods don't expose any of the Qt types as API, we could try putting all
> the #include's that we use in the implementation into an anonymous
> namespace.
Tha
Hi,
In Debian/Ubuntu, we received some bug reports ([1], [2], [3]) stating
that compiling QtWebKit apps fails with ld errors like this one:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgstapp-0.10
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgstinterfaces-0.10
...
After digging the problem, we found out that the reaso
Mandag 19. august 2013 15.14.03 skrev Thiago Macieira:
> Hello
>
> Commit ebfd85a499a4382ace09d443b1f35cd6b1848af6 adds support for -Werror,
> but it hasn't been acted on yet. The commit says:
>
> This is enabled only for -developer-builds and only for certain
> compiler-version combinati
Hi,
I haven't seen any other mails about this. Is anyone who is capable of doing
something about it aware of the problem that qtbase CI keeps failing for
reasons unrelated to the patches under test?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.ci-reports
Is anything being done about it? It see
Done in Gerrit.
--
Sergio Ahumada
Release Engineer - Digia, Qt
From: Gladhorn Frederik
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 14:34
To: development@qt-project.org; Ahumada Sergio
Cc: Kevin Ottens
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Kevin Ottens as Approver
One
One month has passed, congratulations Kevin :)
Sergio, can you give Kevin approver rights? Thanks!
Cheers,
Frederik
On 07/23/2013 03:11 PM, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to nominate Kevin Ottens as approver for the Qt Project.
>
> Kevin has been working on KDE for a long time
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Alpert [mailto:4163654...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:31 AM
> To: Koehne Kai
> Cc: Blasche Alexander; Bubke Marco; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: New JIRA type 'Feature'? (was RE: [Development] FW: Proposal
> for RFC like feat
Just for the protocol. I am actually in favor of Kai's proposal. It is better
than some mega release task as his proposal actually permits to see tasks which
are not yet scheduled for any particular release.
--
Alex
From: Koehne Kai
Sent: Wednesday, Aug
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:28:29PM +0530, Amogh Kudari wrote:
> Debugging the issue further I am amble to see that its failing to
> launch remote inspector because its unable to find the inspector.html file.
You're on your own if you're using an outdated trunk revision, especiall
What about making ApplicationWindow a Item? We could skip the contentItem and
there would be designer support.
From: development-bounces+marco.bubke=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+marco.bubke=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Tomasz
Olszak [
From: Alan Alpert [4163654...@gmail.com]:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Alright, discussion about a new JIRA type 'Feature' went on at
>
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTJIRA-233
>
> with two different ideas:
>
> 1) That we already have too many issue types in
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Right now, I've got most modules compiling with -Werror with GCC 4.7. I'd like
> to start adding the CONFIG to enable the flag.
>
> Objections?
One potential problem I see (I haven't looked at your changes, sorry,
holiday and lack of time
Hi all maintainers (and others as well)!
Qt 5.1.1 release is coming soon. Please update known issues page if needed:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt511KnownIssues
Br,
Jani
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.o
Hello All,
Debugging the issue further I am amble to see that its failing to
launch remote inspector because its unable to find the inspector.html file.
Its failing in condition in InspectorServerQt.cpp
void InspectorServerRequestHandlerQt::tcpReadyRead()
{
.
Q
On 20 August 2013 08:41, Koehne Kai wrote:
>> Is there any way to avoid the ICU dependency in QtCore while still building
>> QtWebKit with it?
>
> That would be part of the discussed changes, but it's not there yet.
>
> For Qt 5.x, I suggest you configure Qt with '-no-icu', and then run 'qmake
>
On 20.08.13 09:15, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 06:24:01, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> A slightly hacky solution might be to force inlining of inline methods
>>in
>> these files. With gcc, we could achieve that by defining inline to
>> __attribute__((always_inline)) on
I think Kai's suggestion is likely to work :)
Simon
Fra: Koehne Kai
Sendt: 08:41 tirsdag 20. august 2013
Til: Josh Faust; development
Emne: Re: [Development] Windows: Building QtCore without ICU while still using
it for QtWebKit?
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.ko
Hi,
Catching up on this long thread finally. I am actually with Andre (and
others arguing similarly) here. The sanity bot is a good thing to have,
and it finds issues a lot more often then making mistakes.
Yes, there are a few things, where the bot can be wrong and for that we
can overrule it. Bu
On terça-feira, 20 de agosto de 2013 06:24:01, Knoll Lars wrote:
> A slightly hacky solution might be to force inlining of inline methods in
> these files. With gcc, we could achieve that by defining inline to
> __attribute__((always_inline)) on the top of the file that's being
> compiled.
That do
36 matches
Mail list logo
