[Development] qtbase.git code coverage statistics

2013-10-08 Thread Sébastien Fricker
Hi, The code coverage statistics of qtbase.git are now online again: http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/ The build was broken due to the sanity check which was treating warnings as errors. Regards, Sébastien NOTE: if you see that something is broken, do not hesitate to

Re: [Development] Names of classes in Android Extras

2013-10-08 Thread Lopes Yoann
On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Would this class work with a different JNI? Suppose Qt Jambi wanted to use those classes. Would they even compile? Compiling wouldn't be the problem. A few implementation details can work only on Android, namely the

Re: [Development] QtTest for everybody

2013-10-08 Thread Dmitry Ashkadov
07.10.2013 23:27, Thiago Macieira пишет: On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2013 22:50:49, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote: The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest

Re: [Development] QtTest for everybody

2013-10-08 Thread André Somers
Op 7-10-2013 21:27, Thiago Macieira schreef: On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2013 22:50:49, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote: The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest

Re: [Development] Building Qt5.2 under Visual Studio 2013

2013-10-08 Thread Mitch Curtis
On 10/07/2013 01:23 PM, Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc wrote: Hi! I’m trying to build a program that extensively makes use of the proper template machinery under Visual Studio 2013 plus uses Qt GUI libs, therefore I took on the venture of building Qt 5.2 with Visual Studio 2013. However, configure.bat

Re: [Development] QtTest for everybody

2013-10-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 8 de outubro de 2013 11:50:25, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote: QtTest doesn't provide macro like QVERIFY_EXCEPTION(expression, expected_exception). And any other compare/verify macro should handle exceptions. This will reduce code in test slot. Sounds like a nice new feature addition

Re: [Development] QtTest for everybody

2013-10-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 8 de outubro de 2013 09:56:59, André Somers wrote: QtTest can test code with exceptions. Just make sure that your exceptions don't escape the test slots. That's a reasonable requirement. Would it be reasonable/possible to record a FAIL on an exception instead? Yes. And

Re: [Development] Names of classes in Android Extras

2013-10-08 Thread Stromme Christian
On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Would this class work with a different JNI? Suppose Qt Jambi wanted to use those classes. Would they even compile? Compiling wouldn't be the problem. A few implementation details can work only on Android, namely the