Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Knoll Lars
That's basically how it looks. I'm happy to accept all patches that are required upstream (after review of course), but the authors (ie. Canonical) will have to submit them here. Cheers, Lars On 10/14/13 9:44 PM, "Hausmann Simon" wrote: > >I agree very much with what Thiago said. Also note that

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Hausmann Simon
I agree very much with what Thiago said. Also note that the project can't _take_ patches, the legal framework requires the author to contribute them explicitly (and accepting the cla on the way). Thankfully there are canonical folks around in the Qt project submitting good stuff in other places

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 19:40:15, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: > Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for > Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's > website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for > including C

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Dmitry Ashkadov
Qt4 systray works in Gnome shell and KDE, Qt5 systray doesn't work in Gnome shell and KDE. About 1 month ago I tested Qt5 systray (from dev branch) and it didn't work. Maybe it is general problem of Qt5 systray implementation? 14.10.2013 19:10, Jiergir Ogoerg ?: But the Qt4's systray works

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Weng Xuetian
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: > > To test qt4 I did "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev", that is, the libs > that > > come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out > why > >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Jiergir Ogoerg
Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for including Canonical's patches into upstream Qt to avoid this issue and possible future fals

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Keith Gardner
It looks like they are trying to create their own QPA plugin for Qt5. For the appmenu changes, they reference the changes they made to the Qt4 source code and are porting to a Qt5 QPA plugin. I would assume that changes for the system tray icon would also be included in the plugin. https://bugs.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Jiergir Ogoerg
I see, you guys don't have time (motivation or whatever) to look closer into this issue. At least I tried. As to Ubuntu's popularity - I don't like Canonical nor Ubuntu - but I have to use it cause it sucks less than other distros I tried out and regardless of the platitudes about "popularity" we

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: > To test qt4 I did "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev", that is, the libs that > come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why > (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Jiergir Ogoerg
To test qt4 I did "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev", that is, the libs that come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't. Since Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending some

Re: [Development] Difficulties using Qt's new categorized logging. How to install filters?

2013-10-14 Thread Mark
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Koehne Kai wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > > Behalf Of Mark > > Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:41 PM > > To: de

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:10:34, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: > But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just > tested myself). > > The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't > work - you can't white-list anything any longer i

[Development] Qt 5.2 Testing (System tray)

2013-10-14 Thread Jiergir Ogoerg
But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just tested myself). The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't work - you can't white-list anything any longer in Unity (desktop > unity > panel doesn't exist in dconf), so it's certainly a Qt5+

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing

2013-10-14 Thread Richard Moore
That's a bug in the design of Unity. See http://www.howtogeek.com/68119/how-to-bring-app-icons-back-into-unitys-system-tray/ Regards Rich. On 14 October 2013 13:34, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: > Hi, > Is system tray supposed to work under Ubuntu Unity? cause it's been broken > ever since Qt 5.0 I gue

[Development] Qt 5.2 Testing

2013-10-14 Thread Jiergir Ogoerg
Hi, Is system tray supposed to work under Ubuntu Unity? cause it's been broken ever since Qt 5.0 I guesss, including the recent Qt 5.2 beta release, the problem is: the tray icon doesn't show up - but it does show up (i.e. works) in Kubuntu (same computer, logging out of Unity, logging in into kubu

Re: [Development] CI has OpenSuSE 12.3 now!

2013-10-14 Thread Sarajärvi Tony
Hi again. And surely we still had one small issue with the servers that was solved today. We already have a few configurations that have passed, on some the compilation and some are now even test enforced :) As we expected, we are now receiving new errors regarding OpenSuSE. Someone here will

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing

2013-10-14 Thread Raul Metsma
On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Thursday, October 10, 2013 15:10:17 Raul Metsma wrote: >> On windows cmake cannot find dll-s again >> Had to change QtCoreConfig.cmake and other modules line 31 >>set(imported_location "${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/lib/${LIB_LOCATION}") >>

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing

2013-10-14 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 15:10:17 Raul Metsma wrote: > On windows cmake cannot find dll-s again > Had to change QtCoreConfig.cmake and other modules line 31 > set(imported_location "${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/lib/${LIB_LOCATION}") > to > set(imported_location "${_qt5Core_install_prefix

Re: [Development] Difficulties using Qt's new categorized logging. How to install filters?

2013-10-14 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Mark > Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:41 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Difficulties usin

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2 Testing

2013-10-14 Thread Cornelius Hald
Hi, I guess you mean Oct 17th, not Sep :) Anyways from initial testing it looks quite nice, personally I'd like to see some movement on the following bugs, but as they are only P2, I guess it is wishful thinking... https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30435 https://bugreports.qt-projec

[Development] Qt 5.2 Testing

2013-10-14 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all! We managed to update qt5.git during the weekend and so on we have new snapshot available for testing. According to plan Qt5.2 beta release is this Thursday (17th Sep) so we are really hoping you could help us to verify these packages and tell if there is still some issues which must be