Hi all!
We managed to update qt5.git during the weekend and so on we have new snapshot
available for testing. According to plan Qt5.2 beta release is this Thursday
(17th Sep) so we are really hoping you could help us to verify these packages
and tell if there is still some issues which must be
Hi,
I guess you mean Oct 17th, not Sep :)
Anyways from initial testing it looks quite nice, personally I'd like to
see some movement on the following bugs, but as they are only P2, I
guess it is wishful thinking...
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30435
https://bugreports.qt-projec
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Mark
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:41 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Difficulties usin
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 15:10:17 Raul Metsma wrote:
> On windows cmake cannot find dll-s again
> Had to change QtCoreConfig.cmake and other modules line 31
> set(imported_location "${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/lib/${LIB_LOCATION}")
> to
> set(imported_location "${_qt5Core_install_prefix
On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Thursday, October 10, 2013 15:10:17 Raul Metsma wrote:
>> On windows cmake cannot find dll-s again
>> Had to change QtCoreConfig.cmake and other modules line 31
>>set(imported_location "${_qt5Core_install_prefix}/lib/${LIB_LOCATION}")
>>
Hi again.
And surely we still had one small issue with the servers that was solved today.
We already have a few configurations that have passed, on some the compilation
and some are now even test enforced :)
As we expected, we are now receiving new errors regarding OpenSuSE. Someone
here will
Hi,
Is system tray supposed to work under Ubuntu Unity? cause it's been broken
ever since Qt 5.0 I guesss, including the recent Qt 5.2 beta release, the
problem is: the tray icon doesn't show up - but it does show up (i.e.
works) in Kubuntu (same computer, logging out of Unity, logging in into
kubu
That's a bug in the design of Unity. See
http://www.howtogeek.com/68119/how-to-bring-app-icons-back-into-unitys-system-tray/
Regards
Rich.
On 14 October 2013 13:34, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> Hi,
> Is system tray supposed to work under Ubuntu Unity? cause it's been broken
> ever since Qt 5.0 I gue
But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just
tested myself).
The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't
work - you can't white-list anything any longer in Unity (desktop > unity >
panel doesn't exist in dconf), so it's certainly a Qt5+
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:10:34, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> But the Qt4's systray works properly in this same version of Unity (I just
> tested myself).
>
> The issue you linked to is a different one, and the post is old and doesn't
> work - you can't white-list anything any longer i
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
> > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
> > Behalf Of Mark
> > Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 3:41 PM
> > To: de
To test qt4 I did "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev", that is, the libs that
come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why
(Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't.
Since Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending
some
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> To test qt4 I did "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev", that is, the libs that
> come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out why
> (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't.
I see, you guys don't have time (motivation or whatever) to look closer
into this issue. At least I tried.
As to Ubuntu's popularity - I don't like Canonical nor Ubuntu - but I have
to use it cause it sucks less than other distros I tried out and regardless
of the platitudes about "popularity" we
It looks like they are trying to create their own QPA plugin for Qt5. For
the appmenu changes, they reference the changes they made to the Qt4 source
code and are porting to a Qt5 QPA plugin. I would assume that changes for
the system tray icon would also be included in the plugin.
https://bugs.
Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for
Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's
website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for
including Canonical's patches into upstream Qt to avoid this issue and
possible future fals
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> > To test qt4 I did "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev", that is, the libs
> that
> > come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out
> why
> >
Qt4 systray works in Gnome shell and KDE, Qt5 systray doesn't work in
Gnome shell and KDE. About 1 month ago I tested Qt5 systray (from dev
branch) and it didn't work. Maybe it is general problem of Qt5 systray
implementation?
14.10.2013 19:10, Jiergir Ogoerg ?:
But the Qt4's systray works
On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 19:40:15, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for
> Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's
> website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for
> including C
I agree very much with what Thiago said. Also note that the project can't
_take_ patches, the legal framework requires the author to contribute them
explicitly (and accepting the cla on the way).
Thankfully there are canonical folks around in the Qt project submitting good
stuff in other places
That's basically how it looks. I'm happy to accept all patches that are
required upstream (after review of course), but the authors (ie.
Canonical) will have to submit them here.
Cheers,
Lars
On 10/14/13 9:44 PM, "Hausmann Simon" wrote:
>
>I agree very much with what Thiago said. Also note that
21 matches
Mail list logo
