[Development] Project ERROR: Could not resolve platform name for SDK 'macosx10.8'

2014-04-07 Thread Amit Biran
Hello, I'm trying to build on MacOS any of the Example Qt projects. OSX: 10.8.5 (Mountain Lion) Qt Creator Info: Based on Qt 5.2.1 (Clang 5.0 (Apple), 64 bit) Built on Jan 31 2014 at 06:00:56 Xcode Info: Version 4.6.3 I am getting the following error: Project ERRO

[Development] Qt 5.2.1 save QWindow (Qt3D) as image/screenshot

2014-04-07 Thread Miroslav Karpis
Hi, I'm new to this list, so please re-direct me if I'm not at the right place. I'm having problems with saving a qt3d window to image. #1, #2, #3 gives me blank image. #3 not the right screenshot. When I show() plot3D or plotWidget everything looks good (I get the correct drawing/plot). Any co

Re: [Development] Project ERROR: Could not resolve platform name for SDK 'macosx10.8'

2014-04-07 Thread Ziller Eike
On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Amit Biran wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to build on MacOS any of the Example Qt projects. > > OSX: >10.8.5 (Mountain Lion) > Qt Creator Info: >Based on Qt 5.2.1 (Clang 5.0 (Apple), 64 bit) >Built on Jan 31 2014 at 06:00:56 > Xcode Info: >Ve

[Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-07 Thread Volker Krause
Hi, I'm looking into making the qt_add/removeObject(QObject*) hooks useful on more platforms. Having those available considerably improves the results you get in GammaRay, compared to the fallback mode that tries to find objects via global event filters and hierarchies. The current situation i

[Development] Qt-iOS: Popover-Like Styled Frames

2014-04-07 Thread Robert Iakobashvili
Hi, There are some icons on the top toolbar of my Qt-application. I'd like to have dropdown popover-like frames i.e. for fast selection of some settings or selection of applications to share with, etc with maximum "nativity" like have most iPad applications. Is there any way to code it with Qt?

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

2014-04-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em seg 07 abr 2014, às 17:48:46, Volker Krause escreveu: > The current situation is that the hooks work fine on Linux/QNX in > combination with LD_PRELOAD (unless you have a non-recent gold that > ignores > QtCore.dynlist). They also work on Mac/Windows, with the nasty function re- > writing code

[Development] Fwd: Proposal: Location hackfest

2014-04-07 Thread John Layt
Hi, Please see the below email from Zeeshan Ali of Gnome and GeoClue who is organising a Location hackfest in London in May/June time-frame to get Gnome, KDE, Qt, Mozilla, Jolla and others working together on improving location services on the Linux desktop. If anyone is interested in attending,

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-07 Thread Marc Mutz
On Thursday 03 April 2014 11:44:20 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Given that we're post-beta, can we do the header diff review before that > date? I've done some review on new classes. Some is already in, these are still pending: QPageSize; API: must go in before release: https://codereview.qt-pro

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-07 Thread Heikkinen Jani
>>I would also like to request that the following be merged into release >>*before* it becomes 5.3: >> >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/79787 >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/79827 >> >>They're both simple documentation fixes, and already approved. In my opinion these changes should be

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-07 Thread Sergio Ahumada
No changes can be merged in qtbase#release at this point without cherry-picking some test fixes first, so ‎they need to be re-targeted to stable Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. Original Message From: Heikkinen Jani Sent: Dienstag, 8. April 2014 07:44 To: Marc Mutz; development@qt-projec

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em ter 08 abr 2014, às 06:10:00, Sergio Ahumada escreveu: > No changes can be merged in qtbase#release at this point without > cherry-picking some test fixes first, so ‎they need to be re-targeted to > stable I cherry-picked the test. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-07 Thread Marc Mutz
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 07:44:30 Heikkinen Jani wrote: > >>I would also like to request that the following be merged into release > >> > >>*before* it becomes 5.3: > >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/79787 > >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/79827 > >> > >>They're both simple documentati

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-07 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Yes, no more 5.2.x releases. See http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2014-February/001681.html Br, Jani >>-Original Message- >>From: Marc Mutz [mailto:marc.m...@kdab.com] >>Sent: 8. huhtikuuta 2014 9:42 >>To: Heikkinen Jani >>Cc: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-proj

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

2014-04-07 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > As per Qt Commit Policy #11, fixes should be "submit[ted] against the lowest > applicable branch from which a release is still planned." > > That's what I've been doing here. Or are you saying