Den 25-08-2014 17:16, André Somers skrev:
Thiago Macieira schreef op 25-8-2014 17:09:
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:46:12 André Somers wrote:
?? schreef op 25-8-2014 13:24:
Can you provide an usecase why you need this feature?
Sure. In our product, we support having the user choose
Hi,
We are planning to branch Qt5.3.2 from '5.3' Friday 29th August. It means:
-'5.3' branch will be temporarily locked 29th August 2014 07:00 CET
o We will wait ongoing integrations to succeed/fail before doing the branch.
o After that time any changes that are required for Qt
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:22:11 Heikkinen Jani wrote:
§ MAINTAINERS: Make sure all change files are in early enough!
Then please be a nice release coordinator and approve
https://codereview.qt-project.org/92299
:)
--
Qt Developer Days 2014 - October 6 - 8 at BCC, Berlin
Marc Mutz
On Aug 26, 2014, at 4:02 AM, quinn.wj.xie quinn.wj@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, everyone at development@qt-project
I have a question and want some suggestions. Right now I am learning Qt
programming. And I was wondering if Qt supports a customed web browser.
Because our lab is working
Hi,
That said, he surely has less time for Qt. Is the cmake integration
creating any problems?
Every now and then, we hit on a failure (fex with dynamic GL). So far,
these have been simple compile/link errors in the tests, but the issue
is that we might hit a wall once we really need to
On Tuesday 26. August 2014 09.30.05 Friedemann Kleint wrote:
Hi,
That said, he surely has less time for Qt. Is the cmake integration
creating any problems?
Every now and then, we hit on a failure (fex with dynamic GL). So far,
these have been simple compile/link errors in the tests,
Well, I can approve that but I guess there should be some changes in that file
as well ;)
Br,
Jani
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mutz [mailto:marc.m...@kdab.com]
Sent: 26. elokuuta 2014 9:47
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc: Heikkinen Jani
Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt5.3.2
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org]
On Behalf Of Alejandro Exojo
How feasable is to backport a newer BlueZ to that old distro, on the machines
that build the
--
Alex
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org]
On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
That would mean these are the minimum versions the popular distros (release
month
On 2014-08-26, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com wrote:
Well. That would the safe way, and we should keep that in mind for Qt6, but I
believe with symbol versioning it can be done without breaking ABI, assuming
it works as advertised. The libraries would export all symbols as both their
On 26 Aug 2014, at 8:19 AM, Bo Thorsen wrote:
Which is probably the way people will have to go about doing it. Since
this distinction isn't reliably available on Linux and it is on Windows,
then the proper way would be to be able to get the native handle on the
drive to call Windows methods
Thanks for starting the thread, Alex. I still hadn't had time to
really do my homework on my side of this problem, apart from talking
to you :-)
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Blasche Alexander
alexander.blas...@digia.com wrote:
It is my understanding that the current Linux release binary
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:27:52 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
Well. That would the safe way, and we should keep that in mind for Qt6, but
I believe with symbol versioning it can be done without breaking ABI,
assuming it works as advertised. The libraries would export all symbols as
both
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:22:32 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
After the harrowing review process (92 rounds of patches over 9 months!) the
VolumeTypeFlag didn't end up in the final patch. It's a credit to Ivan
that he had the patience to finally get the current form of QStorageInfo
into 5.4 branch
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:45:38 Blasche Alexander wrote:
month in parentheses):
Arch (rolling release)
CentOS 7.0 (7/2014)
Debian testing (no release!)
Fedora 17 (5/2012)
Mageia 3 (5/2013)
Mint 13 (5/2012)
OpenSUSE 12.2 (9/2012)
Ubuntu 12.04
On Aug 26, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:22:32 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
After the harrowing review process (92 rounds of patches over 9 months!) the
VolumeTypeFlag didn't end up in the final patch. It's a credit to Ivan
that he
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 09:35:28 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Tuesday 26. August 2014 09.30.05 Friedemann Kleint wrote:
Hi,
That said, he surely has less time for Qt. Is the cmake integration
creating any problems?
Every now and then, we hit on a failure (fex with dynamic GL).
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:58:41 Kuba Ober wrote:
Unless we want to make this a tri-state: definitely local, definitely
remote, could be either.
Absolutely. It’s not even an option not to distinguish those three states.
The consumer of this data can then decide which side to err on if it
18 matches
Mail list logo
