Re: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other objects

2014-09-21 Thread Hausmann Simon
Hi, In gener‎al I agree with Chris. However I'm a little puzzled that this is happening. If you take a look at the QQmlEngine destructor you can see that singletons are deleted last. So I'm wondering what is happening in your app Bogdan. Can you create a minimal test case? Thanks, Simon Fra:

Re: [Development] Requesting removal of qtjsondb

2014-09-21 Thread Knoll Lars
Yes, that repo is dead, and I don’t see it coming alive again. Let’s remove it from qt5.git, mark the repo with an abandoned comment and maybe commit something into it’s top level directory stating the same. As far as I remember it’s not too much work to move it to a different location in gerrit.

Re: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other objects

2014-09-21 Thread Knoll Lars
I tend to agree. Sounds like a bug to me. Cheers, Lars On 19/09/14 14:37, "BogDan" wrote: >Hello folks, > > Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted >*before* >the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the >active >objects may still need to ac

Re: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other objects

2014-09-21 Thread Chris Adams
Hi, On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:37 PM, BogDan wrote: > Hello folks, > > Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted > *before* > the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the > active > objects may still need to access the singletons in their dest

Re: [Development] New company name for Qt part of Digia and unified web site

2014-09-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday 21 September 2014 10:08:09 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday 17 September 2014 20:19:27 Knoll Lars wrote: > > It's supposed to mean that you can modify Qt's source code without having > > to release the changes. I agree that the text is not clear enough and it > > should be somehow ch

Re: [Development] New company name for Qt part of Digia and unified web site

2014-09-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 20:19:27 Knoll Lars wrote: > It's supposed to mean that you can modify Qt's source code without having > to release the changes. I agree that the text is not clear enough and it > should be somehow changed. Could you ask that be updated? Or use two different ways to