Just for completeness ;)
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27728
On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Samuel Gaist samuel.ga...@edeltech.ch wrote:
On 28 sept. 2014, at 03:26, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On Sunday 28 September 2014 01:02:11 Samuel Gaist wrote:
On 29 sept. 2014, at 09:08, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@digia.com wrote:
Just for completeness ;)
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-27728
Thanks :)
Since it's a documentation update and 5.4 is not officially out, should I
target 5.3 ?
On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Samuel
On Sunday 28. September 2014 15.17.34 Paul Lemire wrote:
Hi guys,
We're working on being able to set GLSL uniform arrays from QML.
Basically what we have is a QParameter QObject exposed to QML as Parameter.
It contains a QString name property and a QVariant value property.
Is there any way to analyze qbs projects with clang-analyzer?
Отправлено с Почта Windows___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On 09/29/2014 09:29 AM, gorthaue...@yandex.ru wrote:
Is there any way to analyze qbs projects with clang-analyzer?
A cursory glance at how clang-analyzer works suggests it should be
enough to set cpp.compilerPath to the location of the c++-analyzer
tool (for C++ projects) and make sure the
Hi Simon,
On Monday 29 Sep 2014 09:20:00 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Sunday 28. September 2014 15.17.34 Paul Lemire wrote:
We're working on being able to set GLSL uniform arrays from QML.
Basically what we have is a QParameter QObject exposed to QML as
Parameter.
It contains a QString
On Wednesday 24. September 2014 23.10.01 BogDan wrote:
[...]
Hi,
Do we all agree that the singletons, by definition, must be available to
any object at any time until the end of the application?
Yes, with emphasis on until. Note that we are now talking about the end of
the application
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Simon Hausmann wrote:
Yes, with emphasis on until. Note that we are now talking about the end of
the application situation, so our agreement ends right there ;-). We are
talking about the time the QQmlEngine destructor is executed, which from a QML
engine perspective is
On Monday, September 29, 2014 04:16:05 PM Harri Porten wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Simon Hausmann wrote:
Yes, with emphasis on until. Note that we are now talking about the end
of the application situation, so our agreement ends right there ;-). We
are talking about the time the QQmlEngine
Hi,
On Friday 26 September 2014 18:01:55 Robin Burchell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Nichols Andy andy.nich...@digia.com wrote:
My suggestions for replacement would be either Giulio Camuffo who as been
main driver for the QtWayland project this year, or Jorgen Lind who was the
On Monday 29 September 2014 18:22:22 Jorgen Lind wrote:
Giulio has driven much of the QtWayland development for 3/4 of a year now,
and I think he is a good fit for as the maintainer.
I can be the maintainer if he does not want it, as I intend to pick up
QtWayland development again.
Given
11 matches
Mail list logo
