On Tuesday 02 December 2014 19:19:06 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 2014-12-03 05:05:49.524 tst_qwindow[7070:1e07] Persistent UI failed to
> open file
> file://localhost/Users/qt/Library/Saved%20Application%20State/com.yourcompan
> y.tst_qwindow.savedState/window_1.data: Permission denied (13)
> FAIL
2014-12-03 05:05:49.524 tst_qwindow[7070:1e07] Persistent UI failed to open
file
file://localhost/Users/qt/Library/Saved%20Application%20State/com.yourcompany.tst_qwindow.savedState/window_1.data:
Permission denied (13)
FAIL! : tst_QWindow::positioning(default) Compared values are not the
Sure. I think there are advantages to be had from bundling, obviously, but
those don't really exist right now. +1 from me.
www.qinetic.com.au - Qt And QML User Experience Specialists
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Simon Hausmann <
simon.hausm...@theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to
>
> Though you probably want to test the https-to-http redirect case (and not
> follow)... was that it?
Yes, that was my motivation for using https.
Although, ignoring SSL error did not fix the issue completely. Now I
started seeing a RemoteHostClosedError on the client side.
Debugging it I foun
On Tuesday 02 December 2014 11:15:55 Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> > Any idea, why its not working for SSL?
>
> Figured it out. I had to call ignoreSslErrors() in the reply object.
You should just use non-https instead.
Though you probably want to test the https-to-http redirect case (and not
follow)
>
> Any idea, why its not working for SSL?
Figured it out. I had to call ignoreSslErrors() in the reply object.
-mandeep
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
You would say this is RC2 because content is updated after official RC.
Br,
Jani
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Giuseppe D'Angelo [mailto:dange...@gmail.com]
>>Sent: 2. joulukuuta 2014 13:22
>>To: Heikkinen Jani
>>Cc: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project.org
>>Subject: Re: [Deve
Hi,
On 2 December 2014 at 12:20, Heikkinen Jani
wrote:
> There is quite much changes in after RC so please test these packages &
> inform me immediately if you find something blocking the final release!
Are those just different packages (with the same content) or is this
effectively a RC2?
--
Hi,
New Qt 5.4.0 snapshot available
Windows:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-rc/2014-12-02_92/
Linux:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-rc/2014-12-01_100/
Mac:
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.4/5.4.0-rc/2014-12-01_83/
src:
http://do
Hi Chris,
i tried your patch with 5.4rc1 as i am working on that.
i get erros like
nfig: Using QtTest library 5.4.0, Qt 5.4.0 (i386-little_endian-ilp32 shared (dynamic) release build; by MSVC 2012)
PASS : tst_librarymetrics_performance::initTestCase()
QWARN : tst_librarymetrics_performanc
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt-
> [...]
> Therefore I propose to remove the command line tool, the bundle loading
> support in the engine as well as the auto-tests from the dev branch.
+1 . We kind of settled on qrc:// as the 'bundle format'
Hi,
I'd like to revive an old thread about Qml and the "bundle" feature we have in
the code base. The last time this was discussed (August last year,
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-August/012261.html ) I
think no conclusion was reached regarding whether this feature shou
12 matches
Mail list logo
