On Saturday 27 December 2014 10:52:41 Richard Moore wrote:
> Hmm, if you set TLS 1.0 you really need to only negotiate TLS 1.0. If not
> then if you're connecting to old servers the TLS extensions will lead the
> connection to hang. Perhaps what we want is a minimum and maximum version
> (though th
On 27 December 2014 at 11:44, Mikkel Krautz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Richard Moore wrote:
> > On 26 December 2014 at 21:12, Thiago Macieira >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, if you set TLS 1.0 you really need to only negotiate TLS 1.0. If not
> > then if you're connecting to old serve
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Richard Moore wrote:
>
>
> On 26 December 2014 at 21:12, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't think we need fine-grained detection, but we do need something
>> better
>> than what we have right now.
>>
>> My suggestion is to set a level. For example, if you
On 26 December 2014 at 21:12, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
>
> I don't think we need fine-grained detection, but we do need something
> better
> than what we have right now.
>
> My suggestion is to set a level. For example, if you set to TlsV10, then
> you
> get TLS v1.0 and anything newer, existing to
