[Development] Is QML Item design deliberately hindering C++ interaction?

2015-02-02 Thread Alex Montgomery
Is it a design goal of QML/Quick to discourage C++ interaction? I ask because every DevDays talk I attend includes some version of the phrase any reasonably complex QML application will have C++ doing its back-end work, but yet I keep running into QML classes that hide important Qt C++ classes /

Re: [Development] Feature freeze approaching

2015-02-02 Thread Konstantin Ritt
Some minor ones from me: https://codereview.qt-project.org/105199 https://codereview.qt-project.org/105200 Regards, Konstantin 2015-01-29 14:02 GMT+04:00 Knoll Lars lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com: Hi everybody, Just a short reminder to you all that the feature freeze and branching of Qt 5.5

Re: [Development] Upgrading the sources to C++11 keywords (Q_NULLPTR, etc.)

2015-02-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 02 February 2015 14:29:21 Matthew Woehlke wrote: * Q_DECL_EQ_DEFAULT - really discouraged I can't think of any case where you could use this and let the code still compile in C++98, so don't use it I'd actually like to see this used where possible and sensible, as the

[Development] New Qt 4.8.7 snapshot build is available

2015-02-02 Thread Salovaara Akseli
Hi, New Qt 4.8.7 snapshot build is available http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/4.8/4.8.7/2015-02-02-3/ Snapshot is built against sha1 8960f7356796948b161159cff404a9ebd1624c5f Added check if fontEngine is still in the cache (current HEAD). Changes compared to previous snapshot:

Re: [Development] Feature freeze approaching

2015-02-02 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Thursday 29 January 2015 10:02:57 Knoll Lars wrote: Hi everybody, Just a short reminder to you all that the feature freeze and branching of Qt 5.5 is approaching. The current plan is to branch 5.5 on the 9th of February. If you have any feature that should really go in and still needs

Re: [Development] 5.3 still open?

2015-02-02 Thread Knoll Lars
It’s not strictly closed, but I don’t think we’ll create a release from 5.3 anymore. Cheers, Lars On 03/02/15 07:52, Bo Thorsen b...@vikingsoft.eu wrote: Hi guys, I fixed a bug for 5.3, but Marc asked if it was still open. I don't know that it isn't? Bo Thorsen, Director, Viking Software. --

Re: [Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

2015-02-02 Thread Ziller Eike
On Feb 3, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi, I’d like to mark a few modules as deprecated with 5.5, and most likely remove them from the binary packages with 5.6. These modules are: * Qt WebKit As long as WebEngine is not (yet?) a “full replacement of

Re: [Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

2015-02-02 Thread Knoll Lars
On 03/02/15 08:47, Ziller Eike eike.zil...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Feb 3, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi, I’d like to mark a few modules as deprecated with 5.5, and most likely remove them from the binary packages with 5.6. These modules are: *

[Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

2015-02-02 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, I’d like to mark a few modules as deprecated with 5.5, and most likely remove them from the binary packages with 5.6. These modules are: * Qt WebKit * Qt Declarative (Qt Quick 1) * Qt Script All of these modules are by now a couple of years old, don’t receive updates above the bare minimum

[Development] Reproducible Qt ; the purpose of QLibraryInfo::buildDate

2015-02-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi After a couple of patches [1], most submitted to gerrit, my current qtbase dev build on linux is bitwise reproducible. This is the first step to let end users check that the binaries they recieve actually matches the sources they recieve. The first simple steps is 1) ensure __DATE__, __TIME__

[Development] 5.3 still open?

2015-02-02 Thread Bo Thorsen
Hi guys, I fixed a bug for 5.3, but Marc asked if it was still open. I don't know that it isn't? Bo Thorsen, Director, Viking Software. -- Viking Software Qt and C++ developers for hire http://www.vikingsoft.eu ___ Development mailing list

[Development] 5.5 feature freeze one week later

2015-02-02 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, As many of you probably have noticed, we had some issues with the CI system over the last week, making it impossible to get integrations through. Because of that we’re delaying the feature freeze for 5.5 by one week to Monday the 16th of February. I hope this will give everybody enough time

Re: [Development] Upgrading the sources to C++11 keywords (Q_NULLPTR, etc.)

2015-02-02 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2015-01-08 17:33, Thiago Macieira wrote: I think it's time to institute a policy that we should fix our sources to use the new C++11 keywords. I'd like to propose the following. Policy per keyword: * Q_NULLPTR - strongly encouraged Use it whenever your literal zero is a null

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Nomating Przemyslaw Gorszkowski as approver

2015-02-02 Thread Nikolai Kosjar
On Fri, 30. Jan 11:00, Orgad Shaneh wrote: I'd like to nominate Przemyslaw as approver. ... He resolved some of the most annoying bugs, and handled many complicated use-cases. He also monitors the bugtracker and asks where he can help out. +1! Nikolai

Re: [Development] CI configuration changes

2015-02-02 Thread Sarajärvi Tony
Hi Here's a wiki page describing the planned changed along with a bit of version information of the tools: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5.5.0-tools-and-versions -Tony -Original Message- From: development-bounces+tony.sarajarvi=theqtcompany.com@qt- project.org [mailto:development-