On Sunday, 2 August 2015 01:24:50 WET John Layt wrote:
> It would require a lot of shuffling code around, as a lot of code is
> in the d_ptr, it would horribly complicate things and there's the
> potential for interesting corner cases, like say adding enough years
> to a date to push it from one
This:
QCOMPARE(QLocale::c().toString(1234.0, 'f', 0), QString("1,234"));
was the behavior until Qt 5.5
With Qt 5.6, this happens:
Actual (QLocale::c().toString(1234.0, 'f', 0)): "1234"
Expected (QString("1,234")) : "1,234"
Is this an expected change?
--
David
Its a behavioural change, after we got quite a few bug reports about this
behaviour (being inconsistent with what people expect). See change
3695285fde904935fc2e88010dac171144e8677a and the bug reports mentioned in there.
Cheers,
Lars
On 26/11/15 09:39, "Development on behalf of David
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf
> Of Marc Mutz
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 9:53 AM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Fw: Change in qt/qt5[dev]: Updated submodules.
>
> On Wednesday 25
On Thursday 26 November 2015 10:10:50 Koehne Kai wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf
> > Of Marc Mutz
> > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 9:53 AM
> > To: development@qt-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [Development] Fw:
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf
> Of Marc Mutz
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:00 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Fw: Change in qt/qt5[dev]: Updated submodules.
>
> On Thursday 26
Hello,
There was a discussion about the "internal" class QFutureInterface a few months
ago on this list [1] about making QFuture/QFutureInterface more like
std::future/std::promise in C++11.
It seems this is not going to happen before Qt 6.
We have a use case for a promise though and the
Hi Christian,
On Thursday 26 November 2015 11:50:10 Bauer, Christian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There was a discussion about the "internal" class QFutureInterface a few
> months ago on this list [1] about making QFuture/QFutureInterface more
> like std::future/std::promise in C++11. It seems this is
We are happy to announce the release of Qt Creator 3.6 RC1:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/11/26/qt-creator-3-6-rc1-released/
Br,
--
Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - The Qt Company GmbH
The Qt Company GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius,
