On Friday 26 of February 2016 00:16:35 Shaw Andy wrote:
> I was creating another bug report earlier today in JIRA and I noticed that
> it was assigning to someone who didn't seem to be right for the component
> at all since I don't believe they are the maintainer for it and I recalled
> that this i
I was creating another bug report earlier today in JIRA and I noticed that it
was assigning to someone who didn't seem to be right for the component at all
since I don't believe they are the maintainer for it and I recalled that this
is not the first time I've noticed that the auto-assigner is c
Fabrice Salvaire wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am investigating to port a content server to an off-line mobile
> application in order to don't rely to a network connection at all. Thus
> I have to port a database, a kind of web framework, a template engine
> and a rendering engine. I believe it can be
Hi,
On 25/02/2016 18:02, Pierre wrote:
Sean Harmer kdab.com> writes:
On Monday 30 Mar 2015 17:38:37 Arjun Das wrote:
Hi ,
I have created a simple qt3d application in c++, which has a rotating
cube.
I would like to add buttons to the windows to stop/start rotating the
cube.
I am not able
On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 09:02:11 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> > This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones).
> >
> > But all the Qt users get a modern / flexible moc, see this thread:
> > h
Sean Harmer kdab.com> writes:
>
> On Monday 30 Mar 2015 17:38:37 Arjun Das wrote:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > I have created a simple qt3d application in c++, which has a rotating
cube.
> > I would like to add buttons to the windows to stop/start rotating the
cube.
> > I am not able to see such an examp
Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016, 09:02:11 CET schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> > This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones).
> >
> > But all the Qt users get a modern / flexible moc, see this thread:
>
On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones).
>
> But all the Qt users get a modern / flexible moc, see this thread:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/470ama/qt_moc_myths_debunked/d09c90e
I d
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Just starting a new thread to get the attention of those that may have
> missed
> it in the other platform.
>
> The proposal is to drop VS 2012 support in Qt 5.7 already, instead of
> supporting it in 5.7 only and dropping in 5.8.
>
> The
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 11:20:16 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> > Since qdoc will be using libclang, any change of getting the same
> treatment
> > for moc?
>
> I don't think that's a good idea. We can't require people to inst
Just starting a new thread to get the attention of those that may have missed
it in the other platform.
The proposal is to drop VS 2012 support in Qt 5.7 already, instead of
supporting it in 5.7 only and dropping in 5.8.
The rationale is that we need VS2012 for WEC 2013 support, but there's no
On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 11:20:16 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> Since qdoc will be using libclang, any change of getting the same treatment
> for moc?
I don't think that's a good idea. We can't require people to install Perl in
order to compile Qt. Requiring them to install and build
Op 25/02/2016 om 12:49 schreef Alberto Mardegan:
On 25/02/2016 13:20, Welbourne Edward wrote:
André Somers used m* for minutes and metres, footnoting:
)* Note the first clash already...
I think it is fairly sane to just insist that SI units take precedence,
especially given that we support m
Dear all,
I am investigating to port a content server to an off-line mobile
application in order to don't rely to a network connection at all. Thus
I have to port a database, a kind of web framework, a template engine
and a rendering engine. I believe it can be a use of case of Qt on
mobile p
> What's wrong with in that case defining the conversion? Or resetting
> the default conversions and defining everything in "space-time"?
By all means provide the means for the user to define context-specific
conversion. I'm mostly arguing against trying to automagically do it
all for them.
On Thursday 25 February 2016 10:56:01 Smith Martin wrote:
> Send ideas for upgrading the Qt documentation to C++11.
>
>
> 1. Which C++11 constructs will be used in Qt?
>
>
> 2. Which of these should appear in the documentation?
>
>
> Send comments to the CC list.
It would be nice if std:: ty
On 25/02/2016 13:20, Welbourne Edward wrote:
> André Somers used m* for minutes and metres, footnoting:
>> )* Note the first clash already...
>
> I think it is fairly sane to just insist that SI units take precedence,
> especially given that we support multi-letter unit names (e.g. pt, px,
> mm, c
Hi,
From: Smith Martin [mailto:martin.sm...@theqtcompany.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 12:17 Uhr
To: Heimrich Karsten ;
development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for
parsing C++
I'm stating it now. What is your objection?
Koehne Kai added, to the discussion of priorities and LTS,
> The current descriptions of the priorities in JIRA [1] IMO aren't too
> helpful, since they focus too much on impact on a release.
The release is in the (possibly distant) future when prioritising; and,
when doing triage, I don't know wh
I'm stating it now. What is your objection?
martin
From: Development
on behalf of
Karsten Heimrich
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:08 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for
parsing
Hi,
From: Development
[mailto:development-bounces+karsten.heimrich=theqtcompany@qt-project.org]
On Behalf Of Cristian Adam
Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 11:20 Uhr
To: Smith Martin
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang
I mean, for example, if a class is "final" how should this be stated in the
documentation? Should qdoc automatically include "This class may not be used as
a base class." or should qdoc just include the word "final" in the title?
martin
From: Nowacki Jed
Op 25/02/2016 om 11:20 schreef Welbourne Edward:
André Somers used m* for minutes and metres, footnoting:
)* Note the first clash already...
I think it is fairly sane to just insist that SI units take precedence,
especially given that we support multi-letter unit names (e.g. pt, px,
mm, cm),
André Somers used m* for minutes and metres, footnoting:
> )* Note the first clash already...
I think it is fairly sane to just insist that SI units take precedence,
especially given that we support multi-letter unit names (e.g. pt, px,
mm, cm), so min will do fine for minutes.
> Numerical values
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Smith Martin <
martin.sm...@theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> Send ideas for upgrading the Qt documentation to C++11.
>
>
> 1. Which C++11 constructs will be used in Qt?
>
>
> 2. Which of these should appear in the documentation?
>
>
> Send comments to the CC list.
>
Si
On Thursday 25 of February 2016 09:56:01 Smith Martin wrote:
> Send ideas for upgrading the Qt documentation to C++11.
>
> 1. Which C++11 constructs will be used in Qt?
All of them, in longer run C++14 too :-)
> 2. Which of these should appear in the documentation?
I do not understand the question
Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016, 15:13:10 CET schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> On quarta-feira, 24 de fevereiro de 2016 22:38:56 PST Michael Möllney wrote:
> > So my question or suggestion to reduced bug fixing time is:
> >
> > - Is there or should there be an authority/committee that decides early,
> > i
Send ideas for upgrading the Qt documentation to C++11.
1. Which C++11 constructs will be used in Qt?
2. Which of these should appear in the documentation?
Send comments to the CC list.
martin
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Welbourne Edward
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 10:33 AM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.6 LTS - who defines criteria
On 25 Feb 2016, at 08:46, Shiva sitamraju
mailto:shiv...@rsageventures.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to put a widget on a given X Display from inside QT application.
Also posted same question on stackexchange
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35498895/qdesktopwidget-for-an-x-display .
Would
On quarta-feira, 24 de fevereiro de 2016 22:38:56 PST Michael Möllney wrote:
>> - Is there or should there be a Wiki-Page giving rules of thump, what
>> inconsistent between API docs and actual behavior is a bug that
>> should be fixed in 5.6 LTS?
(I like the concept of a "rule of thump", but
31 matches
Mail list logo
