On Tuesday 25 October 2016 10:55:34 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:22:41AM +, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> > I would like to also remind everyone, that intermodule API changes need
> > to be merged in two steps. For example if you plan to change a method
> > "void foo()" in
Hi all,
Qt 5.7.1 change files are still badly ongoing, see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/branch:5.7.1+message:%22Add+changes+file+for+5.7.1%22,n,z
I created initial drafts so maintainers, please finalize those now & get those
approved!
br,
Jani
_
On terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016 18:12:27 PDT Massimo Callegari via
Development wrote:
> > It was never supported, therefore it can't be a bug, much less a
> > regression. Indeed we removed some functionality, but one that was
> > technically abusing
> > qmake because it wasn't supported.
>
> > Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 07:38:34 PDT, Massimo Callegari
> > >
> > > via Development escreveu:
> > >> Hi, please add the following to the blockers list:
> > >> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56164
> > >
> > > That's not a bug, so it can't b
On segunda-feira, 17 de outubro de 2016 14:46:29 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
> I have to agree with Thiago. For QFactoryLoader, it doesn't make a lot of
> sense to try to unload the plugins, as we only do that on program exit.
>
> It would be great to make plugins safe to unload, but we all know that th
Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 17:54:02 PDT, Kevin Kofler escreveu:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 07:38:34 PDT, Massimo Callegari
> >
> > via Development escreveu:
> >> Hi, please add the following to the blockers list:
> >> https://bugreports.qt
Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 17:14:47 PDT, Benjamin TERRIER
escreveu:
> This patch fixes tools\configure\environment.cpp
>
> However in 5.8 the fixed line does not exist anymore in this file, but
> the same regexp appeared in configure.pri (which is a new file
> compared to 5.6).
> S
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 07:38:34 PDT, Massimo Callegari
> via Development escreveu:
>> Hi, please add the following to the blockers list:
>> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56164
>
> That's not a bug, so it can't be a blocker.
It's a regression, e
2016-10-25 16:53 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira :
>
> Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 16:42:43 PDT, Benjamin TERRIER
> escreveu:
> > I just found a bug in 5.8 which make "impossible" to build Qt with MSVC on
> > French systems:
> >
> > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56731
> >
> > There
Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 16:42:43 PDT, Benjamin TERRIER
escreveu:
> I just found a bug in 5.8 which make "impossible" to build Qt with MSVC on
> French systems:
>
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56731
>
> There is a workaround though: fix qconfig.pri after running confi
Hi,
I just found a bug in 5.8 which make "impossible" to build Qt with MSVC on
French systems:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56731
There is a workaround though: fix qconfig.pri after running configure.
On a side note this bug might cause side effects on English systems as
QT_CL_MAJOR_V
Em terça-feira, 25 de outubro de 2016, às 07:38:34 PDT, Massimo Callegari via
Development escreveu:
> Hi, please add the following to the blockers list:
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56164
That's not a bug, so it can't be a blocker.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Hi,
The update went terribly wrong. We essentially lost the machine, because of
a snapshot which corrupted partition. We needed to reinstall everything. The
machinery is running now, but it doesn't accept standard builds until we
reconstruct cache (qt5 builds for all active branches). It can
Hi Arno,
>On 24 October 2016 at 00:53, Arno Rehn wrote:
>> Hey everybody,
>>
>> At my company we've developed a Python client for QtWebChannel. It
>> consists of a more or less direct translation of qwebchannel.js and
>> an additional layer on top of it, providing async/await syntax
>> support
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:22:41AM +, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> I would like to also remind everyone, that intermodule API changes need to be
> merged in two steps. For example if you plan to change a method "void foo()"
> in qtbase to "void foo(const QString&)", that would be the right order
On 25/10/16 05:17, "Development on behalf of Jonathan Liu"
wrote:
>Hi Arno,
>
>On 24 October 2016 at 00:53, Arno Rehn wrote:
>> Hey everybody,
>>
>> At my company we've developed a Python client for QtWebChannel. It
>> consists of a more or less direct translation of qwebchannel.js and an
>>
Hi, please add the following to the blockers list:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-56164
Without it, I am either stuck on Qt 5.7 or forced to say goodbye to Qt.
Thanks,Massimo
Da: Jani Heikkinen
A: "development@qt-project.org"
Inviato: Lunedì 24 Ottobre 2016 15:09
Oggetto: [Devel
Hi,
We need to update the Coin server, so the service will be interrupted for a
while today. Sorry for the short notice.
Cheers,
Jędrek
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Good news everyone!
Changing Coin to test changes against Qt5 instead of the latest version of all
modules reduced load on the CI significantly and now the build queue is sane
even in rush hours (reaching around ~250 items instead of ~1700). I hope every
one feels that integrations are quicker
19 matches
Mail list logo
