Em sexta-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2017, às 00:57:37 PST, David Callu escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I spend 3 day to search, fix and test my patch for this bug.
> I finally found 3 Issue about it :
First of all, are you joining an IPv4 multicast group or an IPv6 one?
If it is IPv4, the priority for your
Hi,
I spend 3 day to search, fix and test my patch for this bug.
I finally found 3 Issue about it :
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53127
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-45646
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-30949
QTBUG-45646 have a patch that fix the bug. I did a similare
Greetings Thiago,
I will take a closer look and get this functioning with latest dev branch from
qt/qtbase.
Thanks,
Rob
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 6:33 PM, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>
>> Em quinta-feira, 26 de janeiro de 2017, às 14:19:15 PST, ƦOB COASTN escreveu:
>>
Em quinta-feira, 26 de janeiro de 2017, às 14:19:15 PST, ƦOB COASTN escreveu:
> Greetings Konstantin,
>
> I appreciate the insight/direction and will rework patches for the 5.8.0
> codebase.
5.8.0 is too old for that already. Please base your patches on the latest 5.8
branch.
I've just tried
Hey all,
the QQmlListProperty states:
"Note: QQmlListProperty can only be used for lists of QObject-derived object
pointers."
Since I am bad at reading documentation, I previously tried (I think multiple
times) to do something like:
QQmlListProperty
or even
QQmlListProperty
This happily
Greetings Konstantin,
I appreciate the insight/direction and will rework patches for the 5.8.0
codebase.
Thanks,
Rob
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Konstantin Tokarev
wrote:
>
>
> 26.01.2017, 22:00, "ƦOB COASTN" :
> > Greetings,
> >
> > The
Hello Andy,
Thanks for the quick response.
Let's continue this discussion in the appropriate mailing list.
Reference:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2017-January/025940.html
Thanks,
Rob
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Andy Nichols wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
I think I solved my problem. In case someone is interested, that's my
solution:
//hide "back to top" button when movement ended and we are
//at index 0
onMovementEnded: {
if(indexAt(contentX, contentY) === 0){
backToTopButton.visible = false;
}
}
onFlickStarted: {
//when
26.01.2017, 22:00, "ƦOB COASTN" :
> Greetings,
>
> The cross-compilation of Qt5 and additional modules adds support for headless
> Qt5 applications to run as native k1om co-processor applications.
>
> Files that required modification include 'configure' and
>
Greetings,
The cross-compilation of Qt5 and additional modules adds support for
headless Qt5 applications to run as native k1om co-processor applications.
Files that required modification include 'configure
Hi,
1. I’ve not confirmed if QtGamepad works for Windows Server 2012 (not sure
what kernel that is, but not a supported platform that I know of). Should
world anyway though.
2. Yes, QtGamepad definitely works with Xbox 360 and Xbox One controllers.
It is designed to after the SDL
Greetings,
This is my first post to qt-project mailing list.
The information provided on https://github.com/qt/qtgamepad states:
Supported Platforms: Native Backends
Linux (evdev)
Window (xinput)
Android
I aim to develop QTgamepad on Windows Server 2012R2.
1.) Has the latest QTgamepad build
Hi,
I am currently trying to optimize my Listview for performance. I already
removed most of the bottlenecks by following the great recommendations at:
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtquick-performance.html
However, there is one problem I don't how to solve. It's about this code
part:
ListView{
Hi,
Could somebody create me a new wip/physics branch for the Qt 3D branched off
of dev please? This is to start preparing a physics aspect hopefully for Qt
5.10.
The existing wip/animation and wip/qtquickintegration branches should be going
away shortly to keep things under control.
Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: Releasing [mailto:releasing-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt-
> project.org] On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:52 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Releasing] [Development] Change file
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:51:24AM +0100, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> I don't know what you're saying, much less why it's supposed to be the
> obvious interpretation. A "tagged commit" is presumably v5.7.0 or
> similar; why should a commit without an amends line be assumed to
> relate to one of
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> However, you seem to be talking about *release* 5.x.0 rather than the
>> *branch* of that name, so I'm not really clear on what you're talking
>> about.
25 January 2017 12:13, Oswald Buddenhagen:
> i don't know how you arrived
17 matches
Mail list logo