Interleaving your two emails:
> - Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3
> release target August 2017
> - Qt 5.10 Feature Freeze: 8.8.2017
> - Qt 5.10 Alpha Release: 31.8.2017
> - Branch '5.9.1' from '5.9' at the end of July/beginning of August,
> 5.9.1
Em quinta-feira, 13 de abril de 2017, às 07:44:09 PDT, Alejandro Exojo
escreveu:
> On Thursday 13 April 2017 21:02:59 Randall O'Reilly wrote:
> > This also means that there is an endless potential for language wars,
> > which
> > I’m sure nobody wants to rehash on this list.
>
> Are you sure?
On Thursday 13 April 2017 21:02:59 Randall O'Reilly wrote:
> This also means that there is an endless potential for language wars, which
> I’m sure nobody wants to rehash on this list.
Are you sure? Because in the next sentences seem like you exactly started to
fight for one side. You said that
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> After short internal discussion here is my proposal for those patch level
> releases:
>
> - Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3
> release target August 2017
> - Branch '5.9.1'
Hi,
As discussed earlier this week 5.8 branch will be closed now, in essence as
soon as Oswald gets to it.
Yours,
Tuukka
From: bogdan.va...@kdab.com on behalf of Bogdan Vatra
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017
On joi, 13 aprilie 2017 12:34:27 EEST Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> On 13/04/2017, 15.30, "Development on behalf of Konstantin Tokarev"
> annu...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>
> 13.04.2017, 15:11, "Bogdan Vatra"
On 13/04/2017, 15.30, "Development on behalf of Konstantin Tokarev"
wrote:
13.04.2017, 15:11, "Bogdan Vatra" :
> It's just me or did you forgot to add 5.8.1?
13.04.2017, 15:11, "Bogdan Vatra" :
> It's just me or did you forgot to add 5.8.1?
I think I hear how Mr. Turunen is pulling his hair out reading this :)
>
> Cheers,
> BogDan.
>
> On joi, 13 aprilie 2017 11:48:06 EEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>> After short internal
It's just me or did you forgot to add 5.8.1?
Cheers,
BogDan.
On joi, 13 aprilie 2017 11:48:06 EEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> After short internal discussion here is my proposal for those patch level
> releases:
>
> - Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3
>
With the recent language explosion, there are now languages to fit everyone’s
biases and aesthetics. This also means that there is an endless potential for
language wars, which I’m sure nobody wants to rehash on this list. My point is
just that Go represents a particular set of choices that I
After short internal discussion here is my proposal for those patch level
releases:
- Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3
release target August 2017
- Branch '5.9.1' from '5.9' at the end of July/beginning of August, 5.9.1
release target September 2017
13.04.2017, 13:25, "Konstantin Tokarev" :
> 13.04.2017, 12:32, "Nikita Krupenko" :
>> On четверг, 13 апреля 2017 г. 08:24:39 EEST Randall O'Reilly wrote:
>>> In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to
>>> accommodate updates to
13.04.2017, 12:32, "Nikita Krupenko" :
> On четверг, 13 апреля 2017 г. 08:24:39 EEST Randall O'Reilly wrote:
>> In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to
>> accommodate updates to C++, has anyone given any thought to the radical
>> idea of
On четверг, 13 апреля 2017 г. 08:24:39 EEST Randall O'Reilly wrote:
> In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to
> accommodate updates to C++, has anyone given any thought to the radical
> idea of creating a brand new product using Go? Go (golang) is rapidly
> gaining in
13.04.2017, 08:25, "Randall O'Reilly" :
> In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to
> accommodate updates to C++, has anyone given any thought to the radical idea
> of creating a brand new product using Go? Go (golang) is rapidly gaining
15 matches
Mail list logo