Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
Interleaving your two emails: > - Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3 > release target August 2017 > - Qt 5.10 Feature Freeze: 8.8.2017 > - Qt 5.10 Alpha Release: 31.8.2017 > - Branch '5.9.1' from '5.9' at the end of July/beginning of August, > 5.9.1

Re: [Development] As Qt contemplates its future..

2017-04-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em quinta-feira, 13 de abril de 2017, às 07:44:09 PDT, Alejandro Exojo escreveu: > On Thursday 13 April 2017 21:02:59 Randall O'Reilly wrote: > > This also means that there is an endless potential for language wars, > > which > > I’m sure nobody wants to rehash on this list. > > Are you sure?

Re: [Development] As Qt contemplates its future..

2017-04-13 Thread Alejandro Exojo
On Thursday 13 April 2017 21:02:59 Randall O'Reilly wrote: > This also means that there is an endless potential for language wars, which > I’m sure nobody wants to rehash on this list. Are you sure? Because in the next sentences seem like you exactly started to fight for one side. You said that

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Aleix Pol
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > After short internal discussion here is my proposal for those patch level > releases: > > - Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3 > release target August 2017 > - Branch '5.9.1'

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, As discussed earlier this week 5.8 branch will be closed now, in essence as soon as Oswald gets to it. Yours, Tuukka From: bogdan.va...@kdab.com on behalf of Bogdan Vatra Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Bogdan Vatra
On joi, 13 aprilie 2017 12:34:27 EEST Tuukka Turunen wrote: > On 13/04/2017, 15.30, "Development on behalf of Konstantin Tokarev" > annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > 13.04.2017, 15:11, "Bogdan Vatra"

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Tuukka Turunen
On 13/04/2017, 15.30, "Development on behalf of Konstantin Tokarev" wrote: 13.04.2017, 15:11, "Bogdan Vatra" : > It's just me or did you forgot to add 5.8.1?

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
13.04.2017, 15:11, "Bogdan Vatra" : > It's just me or did you forgot to add 5.8.1? I think I hear how Mr. Turunen is pulling his hair out reading this :) > > Cheers, > BogDan. > > On joi, 13 aprilie 2017 11:48:06 EEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: >>  After short internal

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Bogdan Vatra
It's just me or did you forgot to add 5.8.1? Cheers, BogDan. On joi, 13 aprilie 2017 11:48:06 EEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: > After short internal discussion here is my proposal for those patch level > releases: > > - Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3 >

Re: [Development] As Qt contemplates its future..

2017-04-13 Thread Randall O'Reilly
With the recent language explosion, there are now languages to fit everyone’s biases and aesthetics. This also means that there is an endless potential for language wars, which I’m sure nobody wants to rehash on this list. My point is just that Go represents a particular set of choices that I

Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule proposal

2017-04-13 Thread Jani Heikkinen
After short internal discussion here is my proposal for those patch level releases: - Branch '5.6.3' from '5.6' at the end of May/beginning of June, 5.6.3 release target August 2017 - Branch '5.9.1' from '5.9' at the end of July/beginning of August, 5.9.1 release target September 2017

Re: [Development] As Qt contemplates its future..

2017-04-13 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
13.04.2017, 13:25, "Konstantin Tokarev" : > 13.04.2017, 12:32, "Nikita Krupenko" : >>  On четверг, 13 апреля 2017 г. 08:24:39 EEST Randall O'Reilly wrote: >>>   In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to >>>   accommodate updates to

Re: [Development] As Qt contemplates its future..

2017-04-13 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
13.04.2017, 12:32, "Nikita Krupenko" : > On четверг, 13 апреля 2017 г. 08:24:39 EEST Randall O'Reilly wrote: >>  In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to >>  accommodate updates to C++, has anyone given any thought to the radical >>  idea of

Re: [Development] As Qt contemplates its future..

2017-04-13 Thread Nikita Krupenko
On четверг, 13 апреля 2017 г. 08:24:39 EEST Randall O'Reilly wrote: > In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to > accommodate updates to C++, has anyone given any thought to the radical > idea of creating a brand new product using Go? Go (golang) is rapidly > gaining in

Re: [Development] As Qt contemplates its future..

2017-04-13 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
13.04.2017, 08:25, "Randall O'Reilly" : > In the context of all this recent discussion about modernizing Qt to > accommodate updates to C++, has anyone given any thought to the radical idea > of creating a brand new product using Go? Go (golang) is rapidly gaining