On 2017-04-26 23:33, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
On Wednesday 26 April 2017 07:02:49 Marc Mutz wrote:
FWIW: I'm against adding even more pessimising goodies to QVector. An
area for push_front is such a goodie. The addition this causes is
probably the reason why a QList, even for optimal payloads, is
On 2017-04-26 23:38, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
26.04.2017, 08:04, "Marc Mutz" :
Users
that need a queue can use std::deque. If you don't iterate over it,
it's
a more than acceptable container.
std::deque is not a contiguous container, unlike QList or QVector
Here's
26.04.2017, 08:04, "Marc Mutz" :
> On 2017-04-25 23:04, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 17:49:16 -03 Alejandro Exojo wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 25 April 2017 16:35:01 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> > QVector and QList don't have the same API. They're slightly
On Wednesday 26 April 2017 07:02:49 Marc Mutz wrote:
> FWIW: I'm against adding even more pessimising goodies to QVector. An
> area for push_front is such a goodie. The addition this causes is
> probably the reason why a QList, even for optimal payloads, is
> outperformed by QVector in my
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 06:23:44 -03 Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> On 26/04/2017 10:01, Welsch, Christoph wrote:
> > Project ERROR: msvc-version.conf loaded but QMAKE_MSC_VER isn't set
> > I’ve noticed that in QT 5.9 beta 2 the mkspecs for Visual Studio have
> > changed to some kind of automatic
Hi,
please make sure you don't have QMAKESPEC set in the environment (see
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-60016 ).
Regards,
Friedemann
--
Friedemann Kleint
The Qt Company GmbH
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 02:02:49 -03 Marc Mutz wrote:
> FWIW: I'm against adding even more pessimising goodies to QVector. An
> area for push_front is such a goodie. The addition this causes is
> probably the reason why a QList, even for optimal payloads, is
> outperformed by QVector in my
On 26/04/2017 10:01, Welsch, Christoph wrote:
I’ve noticed that in QT 5.9 beta 2 the mkspecs for Visual Studio have
changed to some kind of automatic detection. If I use win32-msvc, it
seems that the studio version is not correctly detected and the
configure script fails.
As far as I can
Hi,
I've noticed that in QT 5.9 beta 2 the mkspecs for Visual Studio have changed
to some kind of automatic detection. If I use win32-msvc, it seems that the
studio version is not correctly detected and the configure script fails.
2017-04-25 15:47:56: Info: creating super cache file
On Tuesday 25 April 2017 10:09:50 Edward Welbourne wrote:
[,,,]
> ask that
> each introduce self in the course of it - possibly *after* we've made
> our decision, so we won't be prejudiced by their weird hobbies. ISTR
> Lars, when proposing me, just linked to my review history in gerrit;
> that
10 matches
Mail list logo