Re: [Development] Building plugins/sqldrivers with QT 5.9 on windows

2017-05-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 8 May 2017 08:38:03 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Il 08/05/2017 16:47, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > > qmake has changed. I believe there's an open bug report about updating the > > instructions on how to build the plugins. > > That would be > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-5

Re: [Development] Building plugins/sqldrivers with QT 5.9 on windows

2017-05-08 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
Il 08/05/2017 16:47, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: qmake has changed. I believe there's an open bug report about updating the instructions on how to build the plugins. That would be https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-58372 I still maintain that this should be a P1 and a release blocker for

Re: [Development] Getting QtWebEngineProcess.app to run in sandbox after being signed

2017-05-08 Thread Adalid Claure
I just meant are the changes to QtWebEngine you suggested stable enough for "production". But if it's still using private API, then I guess there's no point in trying to submit it to MAS. Damn. On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Alexandru Croitor wrote: > > On 08 May 2017, at 17:22, Adalid Claure

Re: [Development] Getting QtWebEngineProcess.app to run in sandbox after being signed

2017-05-08 Thread Alexandru Croitor
On 08 May 2017, at 17:22, Adalid Claure mailto:acla...@gmail.com>> wrote: I changed the string like you suggested and it worked! Of course, I know this is very hack'ish. How stable do you think this is? I wouldn't know because this is the first time I tried doing it, and pretty much nobody te

Re: [Development] Building plugins/sqldrivers with QT 5.9 on windows

2017-05-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 8 May 2017 04:57:32 PDT Welsch, Christoph wrote: > Without this line it works as usual. Is this a bug within the pro file or > has the qmake call changed? qmake has changed. I believe there's an open bug report about updating the instructions on how to build the plugins. -- Thiago Ma

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

2017-05-08 Thread Lars Knoll
On 8 May 2017, at 13:37, Jani Heikkinen mailto:jani.heikki...@qt.io>> wrote: Couple of comments below br, Jani -Original Message- From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt.io@qt- project.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Tokarev Sen

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

2017-05-08 Thread Lars Knoll
On 5 May 2017, at 13:15, Konstantin Tokarev mailto:annu...@yandex.ru>> wrote: 05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>>: Hi, There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the security update

Re: [Development] Coin: using 64-bit Windows host for 32-bit builds

2017-05-08 Thread Akseli Salovaara
> -Original Message- > From: Simon Hausmann > Sent: perjantaina 5. toukokuuta 2017 09:55 > To: Konstantin Tokarev ; Akseli Salovaara > > Cc: Thiago Macieira ; development@qt- > project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Coin: using 64-bit Windows host for 32-bit builds > > Hi, > > I believ

[Development] Building plugins/sqldrivers with QT 5.9 on windows

2017-05-08 Thread Welsch, Christoph
Hi, I'm trying to build the sqldriver plugins with qt 5.9. In 5.5 it was no problem to build the drivers with following qmake call: qmake INCLUDEPATH+=D:/QtBuild/Qt-Win64/Qt5-WinDeps-64bit/windeps\MySQL\include LIBS+=D:/QtBuild/Qt-Win64/Qt5-WinDeps-64bit/windeps\MySQL\lib\libmysql.lib D:/QtBuil

Re: [Development] Getting QtWebEngineProcess.app to run in sandbox after being signed

2017-05-08 Thread Alexandru Croitor
On 08 May 2017, at 13:33, Adalid Claure mailto:acla...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Well, to be fair, it seems you haven't heeded my advice, and are going with > the approach of sandboxing the > whole application, instead of leaving that to be done by Chromium. Hmm.. I'm not sure what you mean. How ex

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

2017-05-08 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Couple of comments below br, Jani > -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Tokarev > Sent: maanantaina 8. toukokuuta 2017 12.56 > To: Tuukka Turunen ; Oswald Buddenhagen > ; development@qt-project.

Re: [Development] Getting QtWebEngineProcess.app to run in sandbox after being signed

2017-05-08 Thread Adalid Claure
> Well, to be fair, it seems you haven't heeded my advice, and are going with the approach of sandboxing the > whole application, instead of leaving that to be done by Chromium. Hmm.. I'm not sure what you mean. How exactly should I be signing my app then? Per the MAS, I have to sign it my app wit

Re: [Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

2017-05-08 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
05.05.2017, 14:15, "Konstantin Tokarev" : > 05.05.2017, 10:04, "Tuukka Turunen" : >>  Hi, >> >>  There has also been some interest also for getting Qt WebEngine to be >> released much faster cycle than Qt – exactly due to the security update >> need. Even if we succeed in making substantially m

Re: [Development] abi breakage for qtwebengine libraries in 5.9

2017-05-08 Thread Michal Klocek
Thanks Thiago for the hint, I only tried to make symbols as weak alias, but that did not do the job. Now when you mentioned about default version I checked and symbols indeed were exported as 'default', I will try later today to see if this can be fixed as you suggested. Br Michal _

Re: [Development] DBus signals for (dlclose'd) style plugin causing crash during application exit?

2017-05-08 Thread Edward Welbourne
From: Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira Sent: 08 May 2017 08:47 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] DBus signals for (dlclose'd) style plugin causing crash during application exit? On Sunday, 7 May 2017 22:56:53 PDT Sergio

Re: [Development] abi breakage for qtwebengine libraries in 5.9

2017-05-08 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Monday 08 May 2017, Lars Knoll wrote: > Hi, > > why can't we just keep these symbols around without exporting them through > a header file and make them simply forward to the global new/delete > operators? If we don't export them in a header at least newly compiled > code would stop using them,

Re: [Development] Getting QtWebEngineProcess.app to run in sandbox after being signed

2017-05-08 Thread Alexandru Croitor
Hi, Well, to be fair, it seems you haven't heeded my advice, and are going with the approach of sandboxing the whole application, instead of leaving that to be done by Chromium. Regarding the issues you are seeing now, it is because of the "com.apple.security.application-groups" entitlement ke

Re: [Development] abi breakage for qtwebengine libraries in 5.9

2017-05-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 7 May 2017 23:38:33 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: > Hi, > > why can't we just keep these symbols around without exporting them through a > header file and make them simply forward to the global new/delete > operators? If we don't export them in a header at least newly compiled code > would stop

Re: [Development] DBus signals for (dlclose'd) style plugin causing crash during application exit?

2017-05-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 7 May 2017 23:56:19 PDT Kari Oikarinen wrote: > The failures of https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/180231/ and > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/180232/ happened on Ubuntu Touch > builds. > > That platform is not part of 5.9 CI anymore. So as far as I understand > it hasn't bee