[Development] Maintainers, your actions needed: Change files for Qt 5.6.3

Hi all, We have now created initial change files for Qt 5.6.3. Please do needed modifications immediately and get '+2' as soon as possible. We need to get these in to be able to proceed with Qt 5.6.3 release. You can find all open change files for Qt 5.6.3 here:

Re: [Development] [fix]: Assistant (and others) burning CPU because of #f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 ?

FYI: QCocoaMenu: Stop update timer (Merged) Best regards, Dr. Gabriel de Dietrich Senior Software Developer The Qt Company On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: On Monday, 28

Re: [Development] [fix]: Assistant (and others) burning CPU because of #f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 ?

On Monday, 28 August 2017 17:06:18 PDT René J.V. Bertin wrote: > killTimer(m_updateTimer); > > before setting m_updateTimer=0? Whether or not it's appropriate, this does > solve the CPU burning for me. Yeah, if you don't kill the timer, it will keep firing. -- Thiago Macieira -

Re: [Development] [fix]: Assistant (and others) burning CPU because of #f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 ?

On Monday August 28 2017 23:10:22 René J.V. Bertin wrote: I found a potential fix: shouldn't QCocoaMenu::timerEvent() call killTimer(m_updateTimer); before setting m_updateTimer=0? Whether or not it's appropriate, this does solve the CPU burning for me. R. > Hi, > > I noticed an

[Development] Assistant (and others) burning CPU because of #f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 ?

Hi, I noticed an annoying change after doing the periodic merge of changes in the qtbase/5.9 branch with my standalone Cocoa QPA. Commit f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 introduced a delayed invocation of [NSMenu update], which looks like a good idea. However, in some applications,

Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic

On Monday, 28 August 2017 12:26:55 PDT Jason H wrote: > > > 2. ZeroConf should be a standard thing. Where's Qt's support? > > > > Right now, in KF5 (kdnssd). > > And who puts/[wants to put] KDE on IoT? a) it's just one library. KF5 was designed as multiple, smaller, independent libraries that

Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic

> I seem to remember a big deal about QtQuick 2.0 requiring GL? perhaps that's just for Items? If I'm mistaken, then I am very happily mistaken! QtQuick != QML. QML is a programming language and runtime for said language, QtQuick is a scene graph. It's possible* to use QtQuick without QML and QML

Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic

> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 at 11:38 AM > From: "Thiago Macieira" > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic > > On Monday, 28 August 2017 07:01:07 PDT Jason H wrote: > > Onto my criticisms of Qt wrt IoT: > > > > 2.

Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic

On 28 August 2017 at 18:38, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Timur began working on an simple HTTP server. This is a controversial > decision, since we've long said that Qt should not be the tool for server-side > programs. That might be worth reconsidering as a guideline

Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic

On Monday, 28 August 2017 07:01:07 PDT Jason H wrote: > Onto my criticisms of Qt wrt IoT: > > 2. ZeroConf should be a standard thing. Where's Qt's support? Right now, in KF5 (kdnssd). > 3. IoT generally use web services, namely RESTful APIs. Where's Qt's > support for writing a RESTful server?

Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic

> 3. IoT generally use web services, namely RESTful APIs. Cutelyst has been a nice project for writing web services in Qt: https://github.com/cutelyst/cutelyst/wiki/Tutorial_02_CutelystBasics > a. QML needs an official web runtime, that is, make QMLWeb or one of the similar projects officially

Re: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic

> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 5:00 PM > From: "Thiago Macieira" > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Qt and IoT infographic > > Re the inforgraphic at > https://info.qt.io/whitepaper-building-the-internet-of-things > (not the paper

Re: [Development] Maintenance break tonight and tomorrow

Hi A brief update on last weekend. So on Friday evening we tried moving a few of our infra servers to the new site. After shutting down services and restarting them on the new site, a few VMs didn’t like that. There were badly configured gateways which competed during launch and things went

[Development] Infra problems under investigation

Hi We're experiencing internal network problems which are under investigation. An unknown amount of services could be affected. -Tony ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development