Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Lorn Potter
> On 15 Sep 2017, at 6:47 pm, Kevin Funk wrote: > > (2) And maybe your request: > - Use C++11 member initialization where possible > (IOW: Run clang-tidy cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init checker > on code base and apply all fixes) But then files will begin to have a mixture of the two c

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 18 September 2017 at 10:02, Lorn Potter wrote: >>> The section "Conventions for C++11 usage" in [1] states: >>> >>> "Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet. >>> This section serves as baseline for further discussions." >>> >>> I'd like to push this discussion, because if code i

Re: [Development] QRandomGenerator and boot times

2017-09-18 Thread Sami Nurmenniemi
On 15.09.2017 18:21, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Friday, 15 September 2017 00:31:36 PDT Sami Nurmenniemi wrote: I think we'll just have to accept blocking for the devices without hwrng. I don't know if we really support any such devices. If we do and boot time is essential for those, we'll have to

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 18 Sep 2017, at 09:25, Ville Voutilainen > wrote: > > On 18 September 2017 at 10:02, Lorn Potter wrote: The section "Conventions for C++11 usage" in [1] states: "Note: This section is not an accepted convention yet. This section serves as baseline for further discuss

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread André Somers
Op 18/09/2017 om 09:02 schreef Lorn Potter: >> On 15 Sep 2017, at 6:47 pm, Kevin Funk wrote: >> >> (2) And maybe your request: >> - Use C++11 member initialization where possible >> (IOW: Run clang-tidy cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-init checker >> on code base and apply all fixes) > But t

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 18 September 2017 at 10:36, Lars Knoll wrote: >>> But for new plugins that target a known platform that supports c++11, they >>> can most likely use new conventions. >>> Unless someone can come up with technical reasons the new c++11 member >>> initialization is better than what is there now,

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 18 Sep 2017, at 09:37, André Somers wrote: > > Op 18/09/2017 om 09:02 schreef Lorn Potter: >>> On 15 Sep 2017, at 6:47 pm, Kevin Funk wrote: >>> >>> (2) And maybe your request: >>> - Use C++11 member initialization where possible >>> (IOW: Run clang-tidy cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-member-

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Kevin Funk
On Monday, 18 September 2017 09:38:53 CEST Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 10:36, Lars Knoll wrote: > >>> But for new plugins that target a known platform that supports c++11, > >>> they can most likely use new conventions. Unless someone can come up > >>> with technical reasons

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Svenn-Arne Dragly
On 09/15/2017 06:42 AM, André Hartmann wrote: I'd like to push this discussion, because if code is converted to a new base, it should be clear to everyone HOW to do so. Great initiative! It would be great if the guidelines could be updated to reflect the new standard. What I like to add, is to e

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Gatis Paeglis
> I'd like to push this discussion, because if code is converted to a new > base, it should be clear to everyone HOW to do so. I agree regarding consistency. If we are spending time on this, then it should be done properly. I think Qt Coding Conventions wiki should be moved to somewhere where c

Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11

2017-09-18 Thread Kai Koehne
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Gatis Paeglis > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:43 PM > To: André Hartmann ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Coding style and C++11 > > > I'd

Re: [Development] QRandomGenerator and boot times

2017-09-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 18 September 2017 00:34:03 PDT Sami Nurmenniemi wrote: > > And that would be a non-Qt job. I wasn't worried about Qt on real devices > > because I don't expect it to be run early enough to matter. On VMs, > > that's > > another story, and if you don't trust your undercloud-provided /dev

[Development] [Announce] qbs 1.9.0 released

2017-09-18 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
Hello, I'd like to announce the release of Qbs 1.9, which introduces major new features product multiplexing and dependency parameterization. You can find all the relevant information here: https://blog.qt.io/blog/2017/09/05/qbs-1-9-released/ Cheers, Joerg _

[Development] [Announce] New high-bandwidth Qt mirror for the San Francisco Bay Area / US west coast

2017-09-18 Thread List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development
Hello everyone, I'm happy to announce that we've just added a new mirror for download.qt.io in the San Francisco Bay Area (the first in the US west coast geographic area). This mirror is provided by UC Berkeley and is very high-bandwidth, which should result in a significant download performanc