On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 05:49:48 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Move to the containers session:
> * use qssize_t
By the way, re: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-47629
We should use 64-bit in QJsonPrivate too. Specifically, because of the way that
the internal binary JSON format stores
20.10.2017, 18:14, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On Friday, 20 October 2017 07:09:26 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> I've found this on Intel side:
>>
>> https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/628867
>>
>> I hope Thiago can tell us more about this option.
>>
>> I know
On Friday, 20 October 2017 07:09:26 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> I've found this on Intel side:
>
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/628867
>
> I hope Thiago can tell us more about this option.
>
> I know PathScale had bi-endian compiler in the past, but I don't know if
> it's possible
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
> I would like to request a WIP branch in Qt Base: wip/webassembly
>
> Purpose is for the development of Qt for WebAssembly
> (http://webassembly.org)
>
how does this relate to this effort?
20.10.2017, 17:03, "Ville Voutilainen" :
> On 20 October 2017 at 16:59, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> 20.10.2017, 16:55, "Dmitry Shachnev" :
>>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Are
On 20 October 2017 at 16:59, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>
> 20.10.2017, 16:55, "Dmitry Shachnev" :
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably
>>>
20.10.2017, 16:55, "Dmitry Shachnev" :
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably
>> INTEGRITY?
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> So the question is: are there any platforms that could
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:23:58PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Are there any supported platforms that we do not test in the CI? Probably
> INTEGRITY?
>
> [...]
>
> So the question is: are there any platforms that could break even after
> passing the CI check?
It would help us (Debian) a lot
> On 20 Oct 2017, at 12:33, Sean Harmer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 19/10/2017 19:44, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think should be done there, in case we can fix it
>> some day?
>
> Probably something like how NSObject manages properties of collections. So
I'm looking into vertical text layout in Qt, and the
only things I've been able to find are this old patch:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/73319/2 and the relevant
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-529 .
I am wondering whether:
* there have been some other efforts since then that I
On 20/10/2017 09:06, Pierre-Yves Siret wrote:
2017-10-19 20:44 GMT+02:00 Shawn Rutledge >:
(thread started on the interest list, but I don’t think my comments
belong there)
On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:06, Sean Harmer
Hi,
On 19/10/2017 19:44, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
(thread started on the interest list, but I don’t think my comments
belong there)
On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:06, Sean Harmer wrote:
Hi,
you've hit one of the issues we did with exposing C++ and QML APIs.
Namely,
Hi,
I would like to request a WIP branch in Qt Base: wip/webassembly
Purpose is for the development of Qt for WebAssembly
(http://webassembly.org)
No CI is needed for this.
--
Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
Senior Manager, R
The Qt Company
Sandakerveien 116
0484 Oslo, Norway
2017-10-19 20:44 GMT+02:00 Shawn Rutledge :
> (thread started on the interest list, but I don’t think my comments belong
> there)
>
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 18:06, Sean Harmer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > you've hit one of the issues we did with exposing C++
14 matches
Mail list logo