Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 23 October 2017 14:13:02 PDT Jake Petroules wrote: > I believe we use qemu for the CI machines anyways, so we could probably > emulate a ppc or mips CPU running Debian quite easily. Given the choice, I'd say MIPS is more interesting. It's still a valid embedded target platform (my rou

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-23 Thread Jake Petroules
I believe we use qemu for the CI machines anyways, so we could probably emulate a ppc or mips CPU running Debian quite easily. > On Oct 23, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:14:12AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> For every architecture where the processor

Re: [Development] Any supported platforms not tested in CI?

2017-10-23 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:14:12AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > For every architecture where the processor can run in either endianness, the > system chooses one and sticks to it, so all software is specifically compiled > for that choice. It's also encoded in the Qt sysinfo name: > > $ $QTLIBDI