Re: [Development] Qt branches & proposal how to continue with those

2018-01-28 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 29 January 2018 at 08:59, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > - '5.6' will move in 'very strict' mode > - '5.9' will move in 'strict' mode. So no direct submissions anymore, just > cherry picks from stable > - '5.10' will be closed and Qt 5.10.1 will be the final release from Qt

[Development] Qt branches & proposal how to continue with those

2018-01-28 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi, We have currently really many branches open: - 5.6 - 5.9 - 5.10 - 5.10.1 - 5.11 - dev In my opinion this is too much to handle effectively, especially because there is many branches in stable mode (see http://code.qt.io/cgit/meta/quips.git/tree/quip-0005.rst). Currently '5.6' is in

[Development] Branching from '5.10' to '5.10.1' started

2018-01-28 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, We have soft branched '5.10.1' from '5.10' on Friday. Target is to do final downmerge from '5.10' -> '5.10.1' Friday 2.2.2018. Please finalize ongoing changes in '5.10' and start using '5.10.1' for new changes. First Qt 5.10.1 snapshot is already under testing and we are targeting to

Re: [Development] Using Native web view on OS X

2018-01-28 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Kai Koehne wrote: > Indeed, and we agreed to solve this properly by introducing a plugin based > architecture: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/207651/ This wouldn't also be of interest for developers who want to target Apple's App Store. Assuming QtWebView is an appropriate choice for