On Montag, 29. Januar 2018 14:40:20 CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > I don't agree, 5.10 releases should be done on a regular basis until
> > 5.11.1 is out (Yes, .1, many users don't upgrade to .0 versions...)
>
> +1, I also agree with you and therefore disagree with the
Hi all,
Final downmerge from '5.10' -> '5.10.1' is now (almost) done; only webengine
downmerge is still missing and will be done later today. So from now on '5.10'
is for Qt 5.10.2 and all changes targeted to Qt 5.10.1 must be done in '5.10.1'.
And please remember: Target is to get Qt 5.10.1
Tuukka Turunen (1 February 2018 16:22)
> I think keeping 5.9 open a bit longer has benefit due to it being an
> LTS.
The benefit looks small, to me.
If I have to cherry-pick back to LTS, it's for an important issue; I've
just done that for QTBUG-66076 because it got reported against 5.9.4,
after
