Re: [Development] To improve UX of the online installer

2018-04-04 Thread Robert Löhning
Hi everybody, could (C) be improved by just swapping the order in the tree? Now we have something like: - Qt 5.10.1 + MSVC 2015 + MSVC 2017 + MinGW + Android - Qt 5.9.4 + MSVC 2015 + MSVC 2017 + MinGW + Android Instead this could be: - Qt for MSVC 2017 (partially checked if

Re: [Development] Qt Sanity Bot down -> up again

2018-04-04 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
I restarted the sanity bot just now, please give it a few minutes to catch up on your changes :) Cheers, Frederik On onsdag 4. april 2018 10.28.15 CEST Liang Qi wrote: > When Qt Sanity Bot is on vacation, here is the temporary solution, click > "Review" button, unfold the "Sanity-Review"

Re: [Development] Qt Sanity Bot down

2018-04-04 Thread Liang Qi
When Qt Sanity Bot is on vacation, here is the temporary solution, click "Review" button, unfold the "Sanity-Review" section under "Code-Review", just do a "+1 Sanity review passed". --Liang On 4 April 2018 at 10:14, Dominik Holland wrote: > Hi, > > it looks

[Development] Qt Sanity Bot down

2018-04-04 Thread Dominik Holland
Hi, it looks like the Qt Sanity Bot is down for several days now. Is anyone working on this ? Or is this repository specific ? Atleast i can see some commits not having the bot as reviewer at all and adding it manually also doesn't help (https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/224989/) Dominik