On Saturday, 9 June 2018 16:38:46 IST EXT Marco Bubke wrote:
> So what about some embedded scenario. What is a system library in that
> sense. If people ship their own binary it's not part of Qt anymore. So it's
> their problem but for the user it's still a problem and by a high
> probability you
On June 9, 2018 04:10:58 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> There's a session scheduled for Monday (unless it gets moved). Here's what I
> will propose.
>
> 0) Where not really necessary, delete the third-party code and force the use
> of a system library (see assimp discussion, can be applied to
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 at 14:52, Frank Meerkötter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to point out that Qt OPC UA, which is part of Qt for
> Automation, can also be built with an LGPLv3 license as long as the
> open62541 backend is used.
>
> Regards,
> Frank
Thanks for your clarifications, Alex and Frank.
