El viernes, 8 de junio de 2018 11:59:10 -03 Kevin Funk escribió:
[snip]
> Heya Thiago,
>
> thanks for bringing this up on the mailing list. I have authored the patch
> which (also) removed qt5_use_modules(). To my excuse, I haven't expected
> that so many projects still use said macro actively. I
On Monday, 11 June 2018 22:50:09 CEST Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> Would it also make sense to explore msgpack? https://msgpack.org/
No. Msgpack is the older version of CBOR, which we already have.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 11 June 2018 13:23:21 CEST Liang Qi wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
> > >
> > > === Protobuf ===
> > >
> > > * Need
Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Date_Time
Howard Hinnant's new civil calendar and timezone proposals have made it to the
C++ 20 draft (N4750)
* Not implemented yet in any C++ Standard Library
=== Time Zone ===
* Why would we use this, if we have to keep our existing code?
** Allows us to
Hi,
We have released Qt 5.9.6 and Qt Creator 4.6.2 today. Please read blog posts to
get more information: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/06/11/qt-5-9-6-released/ and
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/06/11/qt-creator-4-6-2-released/
Thanks to everyone involved!
br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager
On Monday, 11 June 2018 13:23:21 CEST Liang Qi wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
> >
> > === Protobuf ===
> >
> > * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept
> > ** plugin to protoc?
> >
> > About protobuf
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
>
> === Protobuf ===
>
> * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept
> ** plugin to protoc?
>
> About protobuf support in Qt, I have an old WIP change at
On Monday, 11 June 2018 10:56:42 CEST EXT Eike Ziller wrote:
> If we are about to release Qt Creator with LLVM/Clang 6.0, and LLVM/Clang
> 6.1 is released, this has good chances to introduce bugs. Aside from that,
> updating the binaries that we ship is an effort, since they are profile
>
Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
=== Binary JSON ===
* Was created for qtjsondb
* fast reading
* mmap()able
* Deprecate soon (Qt 5.12?)
** Remove from QJsonDocument in Qt 6
** Provide compat API to read
*** BSJON → JSON → parse again
=== QJsonDocument ===
* Limited to 128 MB of
> On 10. Jun 2018, at 22:48, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 10 June 2018 18:17:31 IST Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>>> 0) Where not really necessary, delete the third-party code and force the
>>> use of a system library (see assimp discussion, can be applied to
>>> qtimageformats too).
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Sze Howe Koh
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 at 14:52, Frank Meerkötter
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to point out that Qt OPC UA, which is part of Qt for
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
