Hi,
as some of you might have noticed, it's several months that some are trying to
remove a long-standing limitation of the current QtQuick architecture: the
inability to dynamically select, at runtime, the delegate to use in a view,
based on whatever approach, either data-driven (typically usi
> -Original Message-
> From: Development project.org> On Behalf Of Paolo Angelelli
> Sent: Monday, 6 August 2018 1:43 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Programmable delegate selection for QML views
>
> Hi,
>
> as some of you might have noticed, it's several
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:22:43 +0200
Mitch Curtis wrote:
> At a quick glance, if we can do it with the existing delegate property (#2),
> it would be nice. That's less complex than having two delegate properties.
>
> One minor problem with this is what we do when none of the delegates match
> the
2018-08-06 14:22 GMT+02:00 Mitch Curtis :
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Development > project.org> On Behalf Of Paolo Angelelli
> > Sent: Monday, 6 August 2018 1:43 PM
> > To: development@qt-project.org
> > Subject: [Development] Programmable delegate selection for QML views
> >
>
Hi,
There are various desktop effects which offer 3D effects (kube for example).
I want to know I anyone knows about any plan to create a 3D desktop,
eg a desktop with not only the coordinates height and width, but also
depth.
I want to work on this, maybe start it. It would be awesome.
Stef
_
> On 6 Aug 2018, at 15:36, Stef Bon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are various desktop effects which offer 3D effects (kube for example).
>
> I want to know I anyone knows about any plan to create a 3D desktop,
> eg a desktop with not only the coordinates height and width, but also
> depth.
>
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: gr3...@gmail.com On Behalf Of Pierre-Yves
> Siret
> Sent: Monday, 6 August 2018 3:34 PM
> To: Mitch Curtis
> Cc: Paolo Angelelli ; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Programmable delegate selection for QML views
>
> > One minor problem wi
Thank you both for the info.
I've been thinking about a desktop in the form of a cube, simular like
the 3D cube ysed by KDE. This cube is only activated by the switching
of the desktop (1->2) for example, and the ctrl-F11 key, sooming out
of the cube.
That cube is - I think - the basis for a good
Oeps, where I write distand I mean distance. In my language (Dutch) the word for
distance is "afstand", notice the trailing d. But I can safely assume everybody
who read my post did understand it ;)
Stef
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-pr
