Re: [Development] Improving CMake support for static builds

2018-10-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 12 October 2018 11:32:10 PDT Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > > but there is no information for the > > flags needed to link against system libraries (freetype, harfbuzz, > etc.) > > it would be so nice to add them ! currently I have to use the following > chthonic horror: > https://git

Re: [Development] Improving CMake support for static builds

2018-10-12 Thread Kyle Edwards
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 20:32 +0200, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > it would be so nice to add them ! currently I have to use the > following chthonic horror:  https://github.com/OSSIA/score/blob/maste > r/base/app/StaticApp.cmake Yep, this is exactly what I'm trying to fix! Kyle_

Re: [Development] Improving CMake support for static builds

2018-10-12 Thread Jean-Michaël Celerier
> but there is no information for the flags needed to link against system libraries (freetype, harfbuzz, etc.) it would be so nice to add them ! currently I have to use the following chthonic horror: https://github.com/OSSIA/score/blob/master/base/app/StaticApp.cmake I think that in Qt the pkg-c

Re: [Development] Improving CMake support for static builds

2018-10-12 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 12/10/2018 15.11, Kyle Edwards wrote: > New Qt developer here. I'm trying to improve Qt's support for static > builds using CMake [...] See also https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-38913. This has been languishing for entirely too long; it will be great if someone can finally fix it! Hopeful

[Development] Improving CMake support for static builds

2018-10-12 Thread Kyle Edwards
Hello everyone, New Qt developer here. I'm trying to improve Qt's support for static builds using CMake - specifically, encoding transitive dependencies in the *Config.cmake files. I see that these files already have inter- module dependencies encoded in the exported targets' INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRAR

Re: [Development] Qt Android Service

2018-10-12 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hmm... Maybe anybody can share a *real* simple working example on Qt 5.11? (with sources)? :) пт, 12 окт. 2018 г. в 16:58, Jason H : > I would not attribute this to Qt without a thorough investigation. My only > use of serves on Android was a Qt app with a normal Android service. As I > understan

Re: [Development] Qt Android Service

2018-10-12 Thread Jason H
I would not attribute this to Qt without a thorough investigation. My only use of serves on Android was a Qt app with a normal Android service. As I understand it, you can't have both Qt App and service in the same app. Something simple like a manifest error is more likely the issue, but without m

Re: [Development] QButtonGroup: When the "right thing to do" is absolutely the wrong thing to do

2018-10-12 Thread Mathias Hasselmann
Hi Boudewijn, these kind of refactorings are neccessary to keep code maintainable I fear. Anyway, it seems like you are maintaining a bunch of custom patches on top of Qt? How about reducing your maintainance burden by upstreaming them? Qt would benefit from bugfixes and new features. You woul

Re: [Development] Qt Android Service

2018-10-12 Thread Mikhail Svetkin
I have tried a year ago. It was ok, but unfortunately i don't remember version of Qt. Best regards, Mikhail On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 15:45, Denis Shienkov wrote: > Hi guys. > > Does anybody tried to create and start the Android Service using Qt? > > I tried this example: > > * https://github.com

[Development] Qt Android Service

2018-10-12 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi guys. Does anybody tried to create and start the Android Service using Qt? I tried this example: * https://github.com/bbernhard/qtandroidservices_example , and also have read this reccomendations from KDAB: * https://www.kdab.com/qt-android-create-android-service-using-qt/ But a service do

Re: [Development] QButtonGroup: When the "right thing to do" is absolutely the wrong thing to do

2018-10-12 Thread Konstantin Ritt
It didn't. Regards, Konstantin пт, 12 окт. 2018 г. в 13:59, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development < development@qt-project.org>: > Hello, > > Il 12/10/2018 12:48, b...@valdyas.org ha scritto: > > Which of course breaks source compatibility. It's bad enough to have to > > adapt one's codebase; but t

Re: [Development] QButtonGroup: When the "right thing to do" is absolutely the wrong thing to do

2018-10-12 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
Hello, Il 12/10/2018 12:48, b...@valdyas.org ha scritto: Which of course breaks source compatibility. It's bad enough to have to adapt one's codebase; but this also makes it impossible to bisect code when Qt 5.11 is installed that had to be adapted. I'm constantly running into this problem. Wou

[Development] QButtonGroup: When the "right thing to do" is absolutely the wrong thing to do

2018-10-12 Thread boud
So, there's this commit: https://git.qt.io/consulting-usa/qtbase-xcb-rendering/commit/69335920f724d2d4a49924f373c4fef57c942831 " Move QButtonGroup implementation from qabstractbutton.cpp to qbuttongroup.cpp Because it's the right thing to do. Needed to introduce qbuttongroup_p.h because QAbs

Re: [Development] Shutting down the CI right now!

2018-10-12 Thread Liang Qi
Hi, Tony, Now the current integration for https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/239542/ and another change looks promising. Thanks. And I plan to hi-jack qtbase 5.12 branch for a batch of qmake and android changes after this integration once more. —Liang > On 12 Oct 2018, at 08:12, Tony Saraj