Please accept also my thank You's. The update definitely brings many
improvements and much fresh air :)
Br,
Alessandro
Von: Development im Auftrag von Simon
Hausmann
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2019 09:32
An: Jukka Jokiniva; development@qt-project.org
> It's good that Bernhard has received an official statement.
I agree! Thank you!
> In general, I think the Qt Company could make a little more effort to
> communicate such decisions, educate its user community, and attract new
> potential maintainers. Actually, communication should start before
On 2019-05-23 10:40, Lars Knoll wrote:
[...]
4. Use QVector to implement QList, if sizeof(Foo) <=
sizeof(quint64) and Foo is movable. I’m intentionally not using
sizeof(void *) here, as types with sizes between 4 and 8 bytes would
not have stable references in cross platform code, so I do not
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:15 PM Shawn Rutledge
wrote:
> > On 23 May 2019, at 07:51, Konstantin Shegunov
> wrote:
> > Yes, exactly like, though it'd need to regrow automatically; and on
> regrow it may need to normalize the order of elements (hence the
> "amortized”).
>
> When should it regrow?
> On 23 May 2019, at 11:50, Olivier Goffart wrote:
>
> On 22.05.19 15:49, Lars Knoll wrote:
> [...]
>> 2. Move QStringList and QByteArrayList over to inherit from QVector (that
>> should be source compatible)
>> 3. Rename QStringList to QStringVector (keep QStringList as a compatibility
>>
On 22.05.19 15:49, Lars Knoll wrote:
[...]
2. Move QStringList and QByteArrayList over to inherit from QVector (that
should be source compatible)
3. Rename QStringList to QStringVector (keep QStringList as a compatibility
name), same for QBAList
I wouldn't do that.
I'd just make using
> On 23 May 2019, at 07:51, Konstantin Shegunov wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:12 AM Mutz, Marc via Development
> wrote:
> On 2019-05-22 22:38, Konstantin Shegunov wrote:
> > What about a rather smart (in terms of storage) circular buffer; a
> > vector. Then the push, pop, enqueue and
On 23 May 2019, at 10:40, Lars Knoll
mailto:lars.kn...@qt.io>> wrote:
Hi,
Been trying to implement this, and of course there are some complications :)
On 22 May 2019, at 21:36, Mutz, Marc via Development
mailto:development@qt-project.org>> wrote:
Hi Lars,
On 2019-05-22 15:49, Lars Knoll
Hi,
Been trying to implement this, and of course there are some complications :)
> On 22 May 2019, at 21:36, Mutz, Marc via Development
> wrote:
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> On 2019-05-22 15:49, Lars Knoll wrote:
>> Let’s conclude the topic of QList. I do see the concern about silent
>> source
Hi,
I favor a well-formed (null) state over a partially-formed state. I agree with
the suggestion of adding null pointer checks into member functions where
applicable.
I think a well-formed state is more likely to enable our users to have a
productive time. Operating - by accident - on a
Hi,
After a few days of usage and getting used to the new UI, I'd like to say that
I'm very impressed!
This upgrade went smoothly and the new functionality is a real productivity
booster. I love the fact that there's now a usable mobile interface. And that I
can edit commits to make small
11 matches
Mail list logo