[Development] Updates on bugreports.qt.io

2019-10-15 Thread Alex Blasche
On 17th October the server will go offline for security updates. The downtime is estimated to last one hour and starts at 7:30am CEST. -- Alex ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Proposal: Eliminate soft branching phase from release process

2019-10-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:16:33AM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote: After thinking about it again, I agree with you that it's irrelevant. There could be a category of changes that would need to wait and I was describing it. But in fact there isn't, since the branching and the associated cut-off has

Re: [Development] Proposal: Eliminate soft branching phase from release process

2019-10-15 Thread Kari Oikarinen
On 15.10.2019 11.19, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:16:33AM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote: >> After thinking about it again, I agree with you that it's irrelevant. >> There could be a category of changes that would need to wait and I was >> describing it. >> >> But in fact t

Re: [Development] Proposal: Eliminate soft branching phase from release process

2019-10-15 Thread Liang Qi
We are using soft branching phase for two categories: 1. feature frozen or minor branch, like dev to 5.14, many new changes are targeting 5.14 release, but happened in dev branch, and not easy to be integrated or verified soon. the one week soft branching phase could help bit here. 2. patch re

Re: [Development] Proposal: Eliminate soft branching phase from release process

2019-10-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 01:40:48PM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote: On 12.10.2019 14.14, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:04:20PM +, Kari Oikarinen wrote: >> As far as I can tell, the major motivation for providing this week >> of >> soft branching is to allow people to fi

Re: [Development] Proposal: Eliminate soft branching phase from release process

2019-10-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 08:38:30AM +, Liang Qi wrote: 2. patch releases, 1st one and others, for the first one, like 5.14.0 perhaps similar story like above. Anyway, for the patch releases, if the changes missed this release, but still could happen in next. So I think it’s better to remove

Re: [Development] Proposal: Eliminate soft branching phase from release process

2019-10-15 Thread Edward Welbourne
Kari Oikarinen (Friday, October 11, 2019 3:04 PM) wrote: >>> I want to propose eliminating soft branching phase and instead use >>> the creation of the branch as a cut-off for feature freeze (or bug >>> fixes for a patch release). Frederik already alluded that there has >>> been some discussion abo

[Development] CI problem

2019-10-15 Thread Heikki Halmet
Hi, We have problems in CI. Integrations don't get VM's for some reason. Hopefully we'll solve this out soon as possible. Ystävällisin terveisin / Kind regards, Heikki Halmet Software Engineer | CI Lead Release and Test Automation | CI Team The Qt Company | Finland | Oulu ___

Re: [Development] CI problem

2019-10-15 Thread Heikki Halmet
Hi, CI is working again. We had some issues with database, but those are fixed now. Thanks for your patience! Br Heikki From: Heikki Halmet Sent: tiistai 15. lokakuuta 2019 17.02 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: CI problem Hi, We have problems in CI. Integrations don't get VM's for so