+1
--
Alex
From: Development on behalf of Timur
Pocheptsov
Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2020 06:48
To: qt-dev
Subject: [Development] Co-maintainer of QtNetwork
Hi all,
I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a co-maintainer of
QtNet
+1
On 20/2/20 3:46 PM, Timur Pocheptsov wrote:
Hi all,
I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a
co-maintainer of QtNetwork module with him
becoming the maintainer of „High-Level network access (HTTP)"* (which
essentially means QNetworkAccessManager
and related classes/cod
+1
On 20 Feb 2020, at 06:48, Timur Pocheptsov
mailto:timur.pochept...@qt.io>> wrote:
Hi all,
I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a co-maintainer of
QtNetwork module with him
becoming the maintainer of „High-Level network access (HTTP)"* (which
essentially means QNetwor
Hi all,
I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a co-maintainer of
QtNetwork module with him
becoming the maintainer of „High-Level network access (HTTP)"* (which
essentially means QNetworkAccessManager
and related classes/code, sub-module 'access' etc.) component and me
co
Hi all,
I want to propose a colleague of mine, Mårten Nordheim, as a co-maintainer of
QtNetwork module with him
becoming the maintainer of „High-Level network access (HTTP)"* (which
essentially means QNetworkAccessManager
and related classes/code, sub-module 'access' etc.) component and me
co
On 19/2/20 6:49 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to create an application using the MapView QtQuick plugin and deploy
that application using the Web Assembly platform. It seems, though, that the
QtPositioning and QtLocation modules are not (yet?) available for WASM.
- Did anybody alre
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 06:26:56PM +0200, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> Should we ever try to work around issues caused by broken CPUs?
Yes.
Because "CPU is broken" one way or the other is rather the common
case. Declining to work as best as reasonably feasible in this
situation might as well end up
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:43:17AM +, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> Even when doing development (as opposed to the pointy-haired work), I
> benefit from having tools that help me to maintain a work-in-progress
> limit, that allow me to see what state the work someone else is doing
> is in (because
On Wednesday, 19 February 2020 08:26:56 PST Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> Should we ever try to work around issues caused by broken CPUs? Maybe we
> should warn the user instead (with big red banner) and decline to install
> anything at all?
That was the thinking on the first task. We thought it was a
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:45:48AM +, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:11:29PM +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
> >> Stepping through the interim steps is not a requirement, so it is not that
> >> much difference to go from Reported->In Progress to Reported->In Review,
> >> really.
> > > Judging from the screenshots, it's the latest and greatest version
> > > of the Qt installer (qt-opensource-windows-x86-5.14.1.exe) [1]
> >
> > Okay, but what version of Qt is the Qt Installer using? Installer
> > team, can you check?
> >
>
> Looking into the binary I've found:
>
> "Build d
> >
> > Judging from the screenshots, it's the latest and greatest version of
> > the Qt installer (qt-opensource-windows-x86-5.14.1.exe) [1]
>
> Okay, but what version of Qt is the Qt Installer using? Installer team, can
> you
> check?
>
Looking into the binary I've found:
"Build date: Jan 8
On woensdag 19 februari 2020 00:51:12 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Also https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-70606, which is when I reported
> the
> problem to AMD, but we did not introduce a workaround since we didn't know it
> was this widespread.
We for sure encountered it very, very often
Just for clarity: systemd has worked around this issue back in 2019 IIRC ,
once the issue has been widely reported and confirmed. Did that allow the
user to boot his linux? Yes, the user is now able to boot into his shiny
and fast (yet insecure and highly vulnerable) operation system. Months
later,
Should we ever try to work around issues caused by broken CPUs? Maybe we
should warn the user instead (with big red banner) and decline to install
anything at all?
> (or buy Intel)
Or let's maybe also try to work around Meltdown and Spectre on i, just for
symmetry? ;)
Regards,
Konstantin
ср,
> On 19 Feb 2020, at 10:45, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
What's the harm in leaving the task in In Progress state while it's being
reviewed?
>>>
>>> There is no harm, but being able to better distinguish the main development
>>> phase of a large task from the review stage would benefit th
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:11:29PM +1000, Lorn Potter wrote:
>> Stepping through the interim steps is not a requirement, so it is not that
>> much difference to go from Reported->In Progress to Reported->In Review,
>> really.
>>
>> So the list you have to select from has one more entry to choose fr
Hi,
I'd like to create an application using the MapView QtQuick plugin and deploy
that application using the Web Assembly platform. It seems, though, that the
QtPositioning and QtLocation modules are not (yet?) available for WASM.
- Did anybody already get it to work?
- Is this planned by anybo
18 matches
Mail list logo
