I was implementing a similar feature few years ago and had the same problem
with QFuture internals --
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/210243
As there was no interest in making those better, I had to hack it in a way
I won't promote here ;p
But since QFuture took a new life with
On Friday, 7 May 2021 03:35:04 PDT Eike Ziller wrote:
> I don’t see a simple way to get a source bundle of that from there, if you
> don’t want to use git though.
You don't want to do that because the build will fail. You must either use Git
or you must pre-generate the forwarding headers before
Hi Sona,
On 07.05.21 17:11, Sona Kurazyan wrote:
You could use the QFutureInterfaceBase (non-templated) class directly
to build a type-erased future, that's basically what QFuture is using
underneath. Although it's internal (not documented and is considered
to be private), but it's declared in
Hi Arno,
You could use the QFutureInterfaceBase (non-templated) class directly to build
a type-erased future, that's basically what QFuture is using underneath.
Although it's internal (not documented and is considered to be private), but
it's declared in a public header (qfutureinterface.h)
Hey everyone,
I'm currently working on making QFuture return types work transparently
in QtWebChannel. For remote clients, method return values are received
asynchronously via callbacks anyway.
However, QFuture introspection is not supported by the meta-type (yet)
and there's no other way
Eike Ziller wrote:
> The official git repository is this:
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/?h=5.15
… and the unofficial one with more fixes is this:
https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qtbase/-/tree/kde/5.15
Kevin Kofler
___
Development
> On 7 May 2021, at 12:28, coroberti wrote:
>
> Dear Tor Arne,
> Thank you for your reply.
> It's less useful since Qt-6 is a phantom, beta, and it will remain so
> for a year or more.
A wise person once said:
> I'd appreciate not to hijack this question for any discussions beyond the
> very
Dear Eike,
Thank you for being so helpful.
This is exactly what I need.
Yes, I used to build from sources and never rely on binaries.
Have a great weekend!
Kind regards,
Robert
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 1:35 PM Eike Ziller wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 7, 2021, at 12:16, coroberti wrote:
> >
> >
> On May 7, 2021, at 12:16, coroberti wrote:
>
> Dear Eike,
> Thanks for your comprehensive answer.
>
> I will try to build it from open-source 5.15 branch
>
> Where is the link to the branch?
> Thanks!
The official git repository is this:
https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/?h=5.15
I
Thanks, Tuukka,
for the information.
Kind regards,
Robert Iakobashvili
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 1:18 PM Tuukka Turunen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Supporting Apple silicon is something we are actively working to have in
> place for Qt 6.2 including full CI coverage etc.
>
Dear Tor Arne,
Thank you for your reply.
It's less useful since Qt-6 is a phantom, beta, and it will remain so
for a year or more.
Kind regards,
Robert Iakobashvili
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:47 PM Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>
> Qt 6.0 and above has official support for
Dear Eike,
Thanks for your comprehensive answer.
I will try to build it from open-source 5.15 branch
Where is the link to the branch?
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Robert Iakobashvili
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 1:12 PM Eike Ziller wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 7, 2021, at 11:47,
Hi,
Supporting Apple silicon is something we are actively working to have in place
for Qt 6.2 including full CI coverage etc.
To some extent things will work also with Qt 5.15 if you build yourself, but
there are some rough edges (and Qt 5.15 is not tested for M1).
Yours,
> On May 7, 2021, at 11:47, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>
> Qt 6.0 and above has official support for Big Sur:
>
> https://doc.qt.io/archives/qt-6.0/macos.html
>
> 5.15 is not yet officially supported, but should work fine as well, so please
> report any issues in JIRA, thanks!
>
Except for
Qt 6.0 and above has official support for Big Sur:
https://doc.qt.io/archives/qt-6.0/macos.html
5.15 is not yet officially supported, but should work fine as well, so please
report any issues in JIRA, thanks!
Cheers,
Tor Arne
On 7 May 2021, at 11:00, coroberti
mailto:corobe...@gmail.com>>
Dear Tukka and others,
Since September Big Sur is a reality.
Which Qt-version supports correctly QWidgets for this platform for
open-source development.
If there's no such version, when the support is planned if ever.
I'd appreciate not to hijack this question for any discussions beyond the
Hi!
>The target is to release Qt 5.12.11 Thu 18th May.
Target is of course to release Qt 5.12.11 Tue 18th May. Sorry for the confusion!
br,
Jani
From: Jani Heikkinen
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 11:38 AM
To: development@qt-project.org;
Hi all,
We have branched '5.12.11' from ' 5.12' today. So from now on '5.12' is for Qt
5.12.12 and all changes targeted to Qt 5.12.11 release must be cherry-picked in
'5.12.11' as well.
The target is to release Qt 5.12.11 Thu 18th May.
br,
Jani Heikkinen
Release Manager
> -Original Message-
> I'm not really remembering at the moment. The development hosts were
> already set to GCC9 for 6.0. So maybe GCC8 works, but we're not testing it
> anywhere (and that makes it basically unsupported).
Well, we're still building things on Windows with gcc 8.1. See
19 matches
Mail list logo
