On Friday, 25 March 2022 13:42:39 -03 Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> * always rebase the commit before prechecking
>
> Right now, precheck is a checkout, which means that the precheck is done on
> top of the revision that it was pushed from. Since that is not the revision
> that it will ultimately int
On 19/1/2022 1:01 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
For Qt 6.4, I'd like to propose we change the way we detect and enable SIMD
support. TL;DR:
[snip]
On a side track. Not knowing too much regarding simd, what would be the
best benchmarks to get a comparison of Qt WebAssembly simd support vs.
no
On 25/03/2022 17:54, Alexandru Croitor wrote:
I would prefer a comment-based precheck system instead, and keep the existing
precheck as-is.
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-4419
See also the other ideas in that bug report, most notably also allowing
to somehow select a subset of pla
Hi,
> On 25. Mar 2022, at 17:42, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
>
> * always rebase the commit before prechecking
I have controversial feelings about this one.
Sometimes i want it rebased on latest HEAD of the branch in question, sometimes
I want the exact parent I chose.
You can get merge conflic
Hey ho,
We’ve had the convenient “precheck’” button in gerrit for a while now, allowing
approvers to kick off a CI-dry-run to check if things would pass an integration
before asking for reviews, and without the risk of tearing down a bunch of
co-staged changes in case of failure.
Two things th
