[resent with my subscribed address, which means it won't arrive in kde-devel]
[cross-posting to Qt dev ML - dunno if it'll arrive because I'm subscribed
with different addresses]
On Wednesday, 27 July 2022 14:54:55 PDT Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> And has no-one else yet run into this proble
El dijous, 28 de juliol de 2022, a les 18:13:02 (CEST), Volker Hilsheimer va
escriure:
> The agreement is that KDE maintains patches like this for Qt 5 so that they
> are available on top of the branches that are available to the Open Source
> community.
> https://dot.kde.org/2021/04/06/announci
Hey,
> On 28 Jul 2022, at 17:31, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 27/07/2022 22:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 27 July 2022 11:47:20 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
>> wrote:
>>> Right now, if one selects "LTS" and "Latest releases" (and *not*
>>> "A
Hi,
On 27/07/2022 22:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 July 2022 11:47:20 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
wrote:
Right now, if one selects "LTS" and "Latest releases" (and *not*
"Archive"), one gets
* 6.3.1
* 6.2.4
* 5.15.2
all of which are bugged AFAICT?
Non-commercial cust
Scott Bloom wrote:
> Fully agreed with all your points, but knowing a release is LTS has value
> even for those without support.
>
> I don't see a problem if someone is choosing a the latest LTS version,
> getting that version since the current version is not a LTS.
The Qt Company really needs to
