Re: [Development] Sub-arch optimisations (was: How qAsConst and qExchange lead to qNN)

2022-11-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 20 November 2022 18:38:08 PST Thiago Macieira wrote: > I've just finished a qtbase build on Linux with two sub-architectures and > the symbol comparison of all the resulting libraries has shown zero > difference.. Done. All modules now built in multi-subarch mode. I've submitted a few

Re: [Development] Renaming quint128

2022-11-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 21 November 2022 02:52:10 PST Ivan Solovev via Development wrote: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444237 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444238 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444239 > > I can only access the first patch. The

Re: [Development] Renaming quint128

2022-11-21 Thread Edward Welbourne via Development
Thiago shared: >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444237 >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444238 >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444239 Ivan Solovev (21 November 2022 11:52) replied: > I can only access the first patch. The other two links show

Re: [Development] Renaming quint128

2022-11-21 Thread Ivan Solovev via Development
Hi Thiago, > Now at https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444222 Thanks for sharing it! > In fact, I came up with a better solution yesterday after sending this email: move the support to QUuid. This allows us to have the new (mostly) source- compatible API in place and simply move