Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?

2023-01-12 Thread Samuli Piippo via Development
Using tags for the yocto builds is not going to help, since the way bitbake tries to validate the SHA1s that are already being used in the meta-qt5 and meta-qt6 recipes. Instead, you can add QT_MODULE_BRANCH_PARAM:append = ";nobranch=1" somewhere in your own configs. This tells bitbake to

[Development] Update on C bindings idea

2023-01-12 Thread samuel ammonius
Hello, About a year ago, I emailed here asking if C bindings could be added to Qt's official repo, and since then I've written a pretty large python script that generates the wrappers by reading Qt's header files. I originally thought that "inline extern" function declarations would make the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?

2023-01-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 12 January 2023 07:54:33 PST Jon Trulson wrote: > The reason this became a problem for me was that meta-qt5's warrior > branch uses these Qt branches (5.12.12 in my case), and these builds now > fail. They should use the tags, not the branches. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?

2023-01-12 Thread Jon Trulson
On 1/12/23 05:26, Edward Welbourne via Development wrote: On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote: Will these be returning at some point? On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote: No. Christian Kandeler (12 January 2023 09:24) asked: Out of curiosity: Who gains what by

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?

2023-01-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday, 12 January 2023 00:24:16 PST Christian Kandeler via Development wrote: > On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote: > >> Will these be returning at some point? > > > > No. > > Out of curiosity: Who gains what by

Re: [Development] Proposal: let's change the release schedules a bit

2023-01-12 Thread Edward Welbourne via Development
Tuukka Turunen (14 December 2022 10:44) wrote: > One of the main problems we face every time with the feature freeze is > a lot of changes coming in just before the deadline. That's how deadlines work. > Having the FF date just before a major holiday period is one item that > possibly increases

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?

2023-01-12 Thread Edward Welbourne via Development
On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote: >>> Will these be returning at some point? On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> No. Christian Kandeler (12 January 2023 09:24) asked: > Out of curiosity: Who gains what by removing branches? On Gerrit it makes sense; we should

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12.12 branches disappeared from code.qt.io?

2023-01-12 Thread Christian Kandeler via Development
On 1/12/23 01:24, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 11 January 2023 15:29:11 PST Jon Trulson wrote: Will these be returning at some point? No. Out of curiosity: Who gains what by removing branches? Christian ___ Development mailing list