> On 31 Aug 2023, at 19:15, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 31 August 2023 09:54:37 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > wrote: >>> It seems very unlikely that one would end up building for Qt x.y.z and >>> then have their users on Qt x.y.(w<z). >> >> With my Debian hat on: I really don't recall this happening ever. Having an >> app compiled against an older Qt version is just normal, but the other way >> around... definitely not. > > Yeah, I think the major/only users of that were ourselves: going up and and > down a release series to test issues.
Topic added for Qt CS at https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contributor_Summit_2023_-_Program Based on this discussion, it seems that nobody would mind if we were to decide that we no longer promise forward BC in a patch cycle. Volker -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
