Re: [Development] 6.7 FF vs. C++20 comparisons

2023-12-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 13 December 2023 08:46:57 -03 Marc Mutz via Development wrote: > The question I have, therefore, is the following: is converting more > classes to the new framework considered a feature as in "affected by FF"? I'd say simple changes should be fine. There should be no behaviour

Re: [Development] 6.7 FF vs. C++20 comparisons

2023-12-13 Thread Marc Mutz via Development
On 13.12.23 12:46, Marc Mutz via Development wrote: > The counter-argument is that this doesn't change much because the C++ > standard knows an operation called Was interrupted when writing this, then forgot to end the sentence before sending :) Sorry... ...

[Development] 6.7 FF vs. C++20 comparisons

2023-12-13 Thread Marc Mutz via Development
Hi, TL;DR: is the conversion of a class to the new comparison helper a "feature"? So, the framework, incl. the necessary qdoc command and some ports of classes (QDate/Time) have made it into 6.7 last week, but the current state of the code excludes some helper functions necessary for product