On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 13:22, apoenitz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:40:28AM +, Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> > On 13.12.23 18:36, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > So, +1 for me on going ahead.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Is anyone else here for/against?
>
> To me this doesn't look like
On Monday, 18 December 2023 07:54:07 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
wrote:
> If anything I think this discussion ties up with the one about the
> future of moc, and whether it should become a compiler plugin. In
> principle this would bypass the problem of parsing the binary module
>
Il 15/12/23 21:33, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
Is the file format for the imported modules already standardised? Is it in the
C++ standard? I don't remember seeing it there.
If it's not a standard (ISO C++ standard or otherwise), we'd need to write
format parsers for each compiler, which raises
