Hi,
I’d like to nominate Orkun Tokdemir for approver status. He has been working on
the Visual Studio Code extensions from the beginning and is currently the main
Developer of it. He has also worked on the CMake side of Qt for a while.
You can see his dashboard here:
https://codereview.qt-proj
Christian clarified (privately) that any major versions older than 5 listed in
\since won't show up in the generated documentation. Keeping a span of one
major version of \since around seems reasonable enough, but do we really gain
much by removing these old \since lines? On the other hand, aski
Sorry to reply directly but can't write much on my mobile. \since does occour
in the documentation but it's suppressed for a long time for everything older
than \since 5.0 in the QtBase (at least, did not check others) documentation.
We don't talk about removing \since at all here. Just for stuf
Hi!
Here is Qt 6.7.3 release note draft:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtreleasenotes/+/592425
Please review it asap; we need to finalize it before official release which is
planned to happen this Friday (27th June)
br,
Jani
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
htt
I'm confused... \since does show up in the generated documentation:
- https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qml-qtquick-item.html#focusPolicy-prop
- https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qml-qtquick-listview.html#displayMarginBeginning-prop
For what it's worth, my vote goes for keeping that information too. As a user
it's mu
Qt 6.7 status
* Qt 6.7.3 release content frozen & packages mostly created
* The target is to release Qt 6.7.3 Friday 27th of September
* Qt 6.7.3 will be the last release from Qt 6.7 series
* '6.7' branch will be closed after Qt 6.7.3 is released
Qt 6.8 status
* Qt 6.8
This doesn't help much. To the original question: When the "\since" was
introduced?
First what I did was to grep for "\since" string on qttools. Only 5 hits in
scope of qttools/src/qdoc - not useful.
Then I've searched for "since" there: around ~200 hits.
By clicking on them I've concluded the c
On Tuesday 24 September 2024 14:22:06 GMT-7 Jaroslaw Kobus via Development
wrote:
> > We didn't start adding them until post 4.0. I don't think 3.x had the tag
> > at all and APIs new in 4.0 weren't marked as such either. That means the
> > furthest back we can go is 4.0. Qt 3 to 4 was also a mass
Hello,
For a while now there has been "Quality of Service" APIs available for threads
and processes in at least Apple[0] and Windows[1].
Typically you can request either "Eco", and Default (i.e. the OS does its
normal thing)
The way these work is that they will prefer running the process / thre
G'Day Paul,
Thank you for raising this issue.
As someone who has performed archaeology on Qt many times over the years, I
would prefer to keep the \since data intact. In the past, this information
has saved me time by helping me to narrow down my investigations to a much
shorter segment of Qt's h
> On Tuesday 24 September 2024 13:37:13 GMT-7 Axel Spoerl via Development wrote:
> > - I can’t seem to find any pattern / rules as to when a \since tag was added
> > in the past. Some APIs have a \since 4.x tag, some have nothing at all.
> > Putting effort into regulating the removal of something,
On Tuesday 24 September 2024 13:37:13 GMT-7 Axel Spoerl via Development wrote:
> - I can’t seem to find any pattern / rules as to when a \since tag was added
> in the past. Some APIs have a \since 4.x tag, some have nothing at all.
> Putting effort into regulating the removal of something, that has
Some thoughts to add:
- I can’t seem to find any pattern / rules as to when a \since tag was added in
the past. Some APIs have a \since 4.x tag, some have nothing at all. Putting
effort into regulating the removal of something, that has been added in an
unregulated way, is totally OK if it’s a
> History and easy access to historical data /is/ important to some people,
> insofar
> at least the commit message in the changes is wrong.
>
> Andre'
The \since info, even when informing about something that got introduced 20
years ago,
isn't a noise IMO, definitely. It's hard to see that it
Am 24.09.2024 um 15:12 schrieb Paul Wicking via Development:
Dear Qt Developers,
I am writing to address a series of recent code review changes that propose
removing the `\since [version]` documentation strings from various modules in
Qt:
...
By making these adjustments, we can ensure that
> [...]
> > I am writing to address a series of recent code review changes that propose
> > removing the `\since [version]` documentation strings from various modules
> > in
> > Qt:
> >
> > - https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/592996/2
> > - https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtb
Hi,
I am on Paul’s side on that one. It’s a tag I always found super useful because
it can help
quickly find when these changes came from by just reading the documentation in
the file(s)
of interest without having to do any git trick (which also allows to find said
information
from the source t
Hi,
I don't feel strongly about '\since 5.x' , or '\since 4.y '. Given that it
doesn't show up in the
generated documentation, it is IMO of little value, and I was
happily approving such changes in the past. But it's also true that it doesn't
cost us much
to keep these lines, so if people that
While I am not a member of the Qt development group, as a user of Qt, I would
support the proposals that Paul made to *not* remove /since
Regards
David Partridge
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
Dear Qt Developers,
I am writing to address a series of recent code review changes that propose
removing the `\since [version]` documentation strings from various modules in
Qt:
- https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/592996/2
- https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/592997/2
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
