On 12/16/2018 08:05 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 05:21:35 PST Ray Donnelly wrote:
As I say it's "ok" for developers but not for
packagers.
Which one is ok for packagers?
From packaging standpoint, autotools are clearly the best. But I would
say cmake is ok for 2n
By porting it to Qt, then it would be automatically
available everywhere that Qt is available.
If the utility was not free open source, you would have to rewrite the
entire utility from scratch instead of "just" porting it.
- Adam
--
Adam Majer
ad...@zombino.com
_
to simple hash
checksums. For example, one file with ALL hashes that is then signed
would verify these hashes (and all releases) as authentic.
--
Adam Majer
ad...@zombino.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
ead this book, but from TOC it seems to cover most
important things about threads.
- Adam
--
Adam Majer
ad...@zombino.com
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
